Tennessee Indian Tribes
For a brief period in their later
history the Catawba lived among the
Cherokee and they may have
occupied lands in Tennessee at that time. There are indications that they
may have been in eastern Tennessee at a more remote epoch. (See
South Carolina.)
See
Cherokee Location
A part of this tribe was encountered by De Soto in 1540, in the territory
now forming this State, probably, as shown by Mr. J. Y. Brame, on what is now Burns Island.
They are also mentioned in connection with the explorations of Juan Pardo
in 1567. (See
Georgia.)
In historic times the Chickasaw
claimed the greater part of western Tennessee, and twice drove
Shawnee
Indians from the Cumberland Valley, the first time with the assistance of
the
Cherokee, according to
the claim of the latter. At an early date they had a settlement on the
lower Tennessee River but it is doubtful whether this was in Tennessee or
Kentucky. (See
Mississippi.)
Meaning unknown, though -nampo may be the Koasati word for "many."
Connections. The
Kaskinampo were probably closely related to the Koasati, and through them
to the Alabama,
Choctaw,
and other
Muskhogean
people.
Location. Their
best-known historic location was on the lower end of an island in the
Tennessee River, probably the one now called Pine Island. (See also
Arkansas.)
History. There is every
reason to believe that this tribe constituted the Casqui, Icasqui, or
Casquin "province" which De Soto entered immediately after crossing the
Mississippi River, and it was probably in what is now Phillips County,
Ark. We hear of the Kaskinampo next in connection with the expeditions of
Marquette and Joliet but do not learn of their exact location until 1701,
when they seem to have been on the lower end of the present Pine Island.
We are informed, however, by one of the French explorers that they had
previously lived upon Cumberland River, and there is evidence that, when
they first moved to the Tennessee, they may have settled for a short time
near its mouth. Both the Cumberland and the Tennessee were known by their
name, and it stuck persistently to the latter stream until well along in
the eighteenth century. After the early years of the eighteenth century we
hear little more of them, but there is reason to believe that they united
with the Koasati.
Population. Our only clue
to the population of the Kaskinampo is in an unpublished report of
Bienville, who estimates 150 men, or a total population of about 500.
Connection in which they have
become noted. The Kaskinampo are distinguished only for the prominent
part they played in the De Soto narratives and for the application of
their name for a time to Tennessee River.
This tribe probably established
themselves on Cumberland River and at o e or two points on the Tennessee shore
of the Mississippi on their way from Ohio to Mississippi. (See Ofo under
Mississippi
and Ohio.)
Although we do not have records of
any settlement in Tennessee by the true Muskogee, it is
probable that some of them occupied part of its
territory in prehistoric times, and at a later date
their war parties constantly visited it. (See
Alabama.)
After
being driven from Mississippi and Louisiana, one band of
Natchez lived among the Cherokee. (See
Mississippi.)
Ofo
See Mosopelia
See
Shawnee Location
A tribe met by De Soto near the
great bend of the Tennessee and found in the same region by the earliest English
and French explorers, living in what is now northern Alabama and perhaps also in
Tennessee. It is probable that they were a part of the Creek.
One band of Tuskegee formed a
settlement or settlements in the Cherokee Nation. (See
Cherokee, and
Tuskegee under
Alabama.)
The greater part of the Yuchi
probably lived at one period in and near the mountains of eastern Tennessee
though one band of them was on the Tennessee River just above Muscle Shoals and
there is evidence for an early occupation of the Hiwassee Valley. Some remained
with the Cherokee until a very late date. (See
Georgia.)
Additional Resources
Notes About the Book:
Source: The Indian Tribes of North America, by John R. Swanton, 1953, Bureau of
American Ethnology, Bulletin 145, US Government Printing Office, Washington DC.
Online Publication: The manuscript was scanned and then ocr'd. Minimal editing
has been done, and readers can and should expect some errors in the textual
output.
|