In the meantime work of grading from East
Portland to Pudding River was energetically
prosecuted, the heavy grading, and certain
spots denied right of way being ommitted for
the time. The representations of Elliott as
to a contract with A. J. Cook and Company,
were found to be no longer serviceable. Dr.
A. M. Loryea, of East Portland, a bluff;
gnarled oak sort of a man, naturally
opposite to fine work, then Vice President
of the company on his side the river, was
allowed to go east on a fruitless search for
the contractors, finding them neither east
nor west, and in no way a connection of Jay
Cook & Co., as they had become to be
considered by the public. The blind had,
however, allowed time for the completion, of
arrangements with Ben Holladay, of
California, (if not at first prepared by him
in order to keep the name and machinery of
the east side company in the hands of
Oregonians until the land grant should be
declared theirs, or to keep up so hot a
fight against the West Side as to kill it,
or to compel it to sell its franchises at a
nominal price to its rivals); and in 1868,
Holladay's money began to flow into the
exchequer and to energize the work of
construction.
As Holladay came here as a railroad king,
and, for about ten years carried all public
matters with a high hand, becoming autocrat
of all lines of transportation and well nigh
political dictator and trans-forming the
visage of the country not only, but
inaugurating a new. system of politics and
of public proceeding generally, it will be
in place here to indicate something of his
aims, methods, and previous history. He was
one of the marked men of the age, of keen
fore-sight, and an ambition and
self-confidence that hesitated not to seize
every opportunity of self-promotion. He
belonged to the second order of potentates
who have sprung up in America. Our system of
government holds public servants to so rigid
an account, and the public press so
scrutinizes their actions, that it is not
the office holder-who wields the power. He
is hampered by constitutional restrictions,
and public espionage, and by party pledges
so that his work even in the legislative
hall or the executive chair, becomes little
more than perfunctory, or that of a factor.
But behind his sphere, clothed with
unlimited power, which laws have been unable
to specify or courts to define, is the money
king. It is popularly believed that his
power is actually unlimited, except by his
own mistakes, by the opposition of rivals,
or by the integrity of influential men who
will not be bought. But these restrictions
upon his autocracy-like that of
assassination as to the limit of the Czar's
absolutism-he of course refuses to
recognize.
At the close of the war great opportunities
were offered by the financial situation for
immense speculations. That great conflict,
in which men were organized and massed by
the hundreds of thousands, and money was
moved by the millions, had taught the
country how to operate on a large scale. A
spirit of daring and recklessness was also
fostered. Those accustomed to risk their
lives, or to see platoons of men hurled to
death before long rows of cannons and
bayonets, felt no hesitancy in risking so
tame a thing as money, by the million
dollars. A new confidence in the nation
sprung up, and, as a sort of reaction from
the moral strain, an intense eagerness for
material advancement took possession. Money,
as a power to control human action, was
valued as never before, and, as is usual
with new endeavors, was invested with a
potency far beyond its real limit. Men of
ambition, instead of following in the steps
of Clay or Webster, and aiming to mould
events by argument and eloquence, figured
themselves as at the fountain head of the
stream of gold, and by its flowing creating
and transforming. It was towards railroading
that the most brilliant conceptions were
turned, and the West was to be the theatre
of the vastest schemes. A patriotic and
humanitarian feeling was mingled with these
ambitious ideas, since the loyal part of the
nation saw the advantage of bringing out of
the wilderness States loyal to the
government which had just emerged from an
almost fatal struggle with secession, and
setting the nation upon a granite
foundation. Furthermore, the idea of
renovating and populating the earth, as in
old migrations, but by new improved methods
of civilization, became once more
fascinating to men of reflection.
Holladay was a Kentuckian by birth, had
grown up in the West, had learned every foot
of country between St. Louis and San
Francisco upon his pony express, had
breathed the California spirit of gold and
adventure, and imbibed the western idea of
the immensity of the future of the Pacific
shores. Not exactly a disciple of Bishop
Berkeley, he had, nevertheless, a practical
notion that the star of empire was about
nearing its zenith over the Golden Gate, and
was as quick as anyone to see the
opportunities for dominion as the national
government was once more restored. He had
had practical opportunity to see the
workings of a railroad era in the Central
and Union Pacific, and as by these roads his
mail contracts were suspended, he very
naturally turned elsewhere for a field. He
had kept careful watch of the great line
that had been projected into Oregon, and,
keeping fully up with the operations of the
companies managing it, he bided his time to
seize their work when the best chance came.
As an American, he was not devoid of
ideality. He had in mind the development of
a new empire. The pyrotechnic editorial
flashes in all the papers about the seat of
population being soon transferred to the
strip of country between the Rockies and the
Pacific were more or less present to his
mind. He thought out some scheme of
colonization. He was, nevertheless, a man
whose selfishness dominated all else, and
his practical incentive was to use the power
of wealth to control a State, and perhaps a
much larger area, in his own name. He showed
no love for Oregon, or for the people of
Oregon, but no other field was so inviting,
or so well within his means.
From his subsequent actions, it may well be
doubted whether his purposes were absolutely
clear to himself, or that he followed them
unswervingly. If his aim was simply to build
a railroad; he might have done it with less
trouble and expense, and for far greater
returns. If his idea was to make himself the
autocrat of the State, to own legislatures
and United States senators, and perhaps to
extend his operations over adjoining
Territories and control transcontinental
lines, he never followed it with
consistency. Upon rigid examination we
apprehend that he would be found a man of
strong intentions, but of unstable will, of
deep schemes, but of feeble convictions, of
large aims, but incapable of sustained
endeavor or sacrifice, and subject to
passion and prejudice. It may also be said
that, although in the strength of manhood
when he came to our State, an excessive
luxury of life and diet broke his vigor long
before he reached old age.
As a working scheme of morality, he let
nothing stand in way of his aims,
recognizing no right except the shortest way
to his object. He had one, And but one,
means of attaining his end and that was the
use of his money. To buy an attorney, a
judge, a city, a legislature, public
opinion, was all one to him. He made no
appeals to the people, neither addressing
them on the side of self interest or
generosity. Upon occasion he published a
message something after the style of a
manifesto or edict. The public new nothing
of him except that he was a nabob living in
unapproachable magnificence, and was at the
head of all that was going. He paid his
agents and let them work their way, allowing
them to use profanity or religion to reach
the object that he named. This was the man
that appeared in his true form above the
stormy rail road horizon of Oregon in 1868.
J. H. Mitchell, one of the first
incorporators of the original Oregon Central
Railroad Company, but also an incorporator
of the second, or East Side Co., and their
attorney, rendered very efficient service to
Mr. Holladay.
Two general objects were now before this
company; one to keep suits in court as long
as possible in order to prevent decision
upon the mooted points-since while the cases
were in court the two companies seemed to,
and did, stand upon the same legal ground,
and neither one nor the other had the right
to assume that it was the true and only
company; and, in the meantime, to get an act
through the Oregon Legislature, designating
their company as the one to receive the
grant of the United States land. They also
expected to push legislation through
Congress.
Upon the assembling of the Legislature at
Salem in 1868, a bill was brought to thus
designate this company and invest it with
authority to receive the land. This was an
audacious move, since in the session of
1866, two years before, the old Oregon
Central railroad had been designated, and
the company of which Joseph Gaston was
president had been duly recognized, and had
received from the acting Secretary of the
Interior a certificate that its assent to
the conditions of the land grant had been
officially filed; while the assent of the
East Side company-which was now seeking the
bill-sent on later was returned without
filing for the double reason that the time
had expired, and that the other company had
fulfilled the condition. But the bill was,
nevertheless, introduced, and upon the
minority report that there was no Oregon
Central Railroad Company of any kind in
existence on October 10, 1866, when the
designating bill was passed by the Oregon
Legislature, and that such bill was,
therefore, mistaken and illegal, and the
Secretary of the Interior at Washington City
had been misinformed; and also that the West
Side road had no more than $40,000 capital,
and that $2,500,000 stock was held by the
president of the company alone. The measure
was passed. This was done in opposition to
the majority report that in their opinion
the. previous Legislature had designated a
company, had declared it to be in existence,
and that its articles had been provisionally
filed on October 6th, four days before the
original designating bill was passed. To
parry the force of this last statement it
was contended in the minority report that
the company whose articles had been filed
October 6th, in pencil, did not appear to be
the same as that of November 21st
following-which was the genuine West Side
Company-since the names of incorporators
were changed or appeared with certain
additions.
Soon after this J. H. Mitchell went with
these resolutions of 1868, favoring the east
side company, to Washington City to secure
favorable legislation from the United States
Congress, taking the dispute to a national
arena. He brought to notice of our senators,
Corbett and Williams, the state of affairs,
and the latter, learning the understanding
of the matter by the secretary of the
interior, O. H. Browning, to be that there
had not been, as yet, a legal company to
receive the grant of land-the west side
company having failed to incorporate in
time, and the east side company having
failed to file assent in time-and that
therefore without an a& to revive the grant
the land must lapse, or had lapsed to the
government; introduced a bill to allow a
year's time from date of passage for any
company to file assent. This was opposed by
the west side company, who were present at
Washington by their president, and by S. G.
Reed, as agent, on the ground that it
virtually took the decision out of the
courts, where it was still pending, and by
putting the two companies on the same
footing gave the east side a legal hold
which it then did not and could not
have-since under the former act it was
impossible for it to file its assent in
accordance with the provision, the time
having long since passed by. The west side
also complained that, as they had taken all
the first steps to comply with the
conditions of the act forming a company,
spending money, and securing an extension of
time of building, while the east side was
for months doing nothing, and never got
around to file an assent in time to hold the
grant, they ought not to be put back on a
par with a dilatory corporation, which since
its formation had been maliciously opposing,
hindering and trying to extinguish the only
company that had had the address and
expedition to save the grant to the State.
In Senator Corbett they had a
spokesman-Senator Williams also disavowing
any hostility to. them, and being anxious
only to save the land-and the general spirit
of the Senate was in their favor; Conkling,
Hendricks and Howard speaking pointedly that
the equities of the case seemed to be with
the west side company, and regarding the
proposed bill as prejudicial to them. It was
consequently recommitted; but at the next
session was brought up, and after some
adverse discussion by Corbett was passed.
With this legislation the east side company
virtually gained its point. Under the bill
it became inevitable that the company which
was able to complete the first twenty miles
of the road within the time specified-by
December 25th, 1869-would secure the land,
which was the true prize and object of
controversy. Both companies pushed forward
with work of construction, but both met with
delays. S. G. Elliott, on the east side, was
found to be either incompetent, or, as
asserted by his company, wilfully dilatory.
On the west side the contractors, S. G. Reed
& Co., who had been the main stay, became
disaffected, and in April threw up their
contra&, leaving the road hopelessly in the
lurch; and, as asserted by west side men,
furnishing the necessary locomotives and
iron for the completion of the rival road.
Gaston applied what money was left, and
carried the grading to Hillsboro. Elliott
was superseded by Kidder, under order of
Holladay, and by forced work the twenty
miles from East Portland to Parrott Creek
was completed December 24th, 1869, just in
time. This consummation was appropriately
celebrated.
Seeing the impossibility of his company
finishing their twenty miles within the
time, Mr. Gaston applied all available
money, carrying the grading to Hillsboro,
and went to Washington in January of 1870,
to secure if possible a separate grant of
land for his company. In this he was
successful, the grant being on the line from
Portland to Astoria, and also to
McMinnville. In the same year the old
controversy as to which of the two was the
rightful owner of the name O. C. Railroad
Company, was decided in favor of the West
Side, Judge Deady holding that this was the
rightful corporation, and the other be
stopped from using its designation. The East
Side company having gained its government
land cared no further for the name, and in
March formally dissolved the Oregon Central
Co., of Salem, transferring all their
franchises and interests to the Oregon and
Californian Railroad Company organized but a
short time before, of which Holladay became
president. By this act the West Side was
left to the undisputed use of the name, but
this was now a barren possession. Under his
new land grant Gaston made arrangements with
a Philadelphia Company to build the road,
but owing to the dissatisfaction of Portland
capitalists upon whom he hitherto relied, he
decided to sell his road-the board of
directors concurring-to Holladay. This was
done in the summer of 1870. The Californian
thereby became the master of the entire
railroad situation in Oregon. Upon the
subscription of $100,000.00 by the people of
Portland, he began building the road, and in
1872 finished forty-eight miles to the
Yamhill River at St. Joe.
It is instructive to notice that when the
East Side road had gained its end, and found
it necessary to dispose of S. G. Elliott,
its attorney declared its early acts as to
the issuance of unassessable stock illegal;
and "A. J. Cook & Co." was then admitted, or
asserted to be a myth, or at least but some
obscure individual whose name was
irresponsibly and fraudulently used by
Elliott-thus confirming the charges of their
old enemy and rival.