Genealogy Records
Biographies
Cemetery Records
Census Records
Free Family Tree Website
History Books Online
Military Records
Native American Records
Surnames
United States Genealogy
Vital Records
World Genealogy

Free Indian Records
Index and Database of Rolls
Indian Cemeteries
Indian Census Records
Indian Chiefs
Indian History
Indian Stories, Myths and Legends
Indian Tribe Listings
Indian Tribes and Nations, 1880
Indian Tribes by Location
Native American Books
Native American Land Patents
Native American Queries
South East Research
Treaties with the Indians
Tribal Mailing Lists
How to Search
How to Register

Native American Research

Dawes: Getting Organized
Indian Tribes of the Frontier
Your American Indian Ancestors
Indian Reservations, 1840
Indian Reservations, 1875
Indian Reservations, 1900
Indian Reservations, 1930
Early Native American Tribes and Culture Areas

$ Ancestry.com Indian Records $
Free Trial - Ancestry.com US Deluxe Membership
1900 Indian Territory Census

Dawes Commission Index, 1896
The Dawes Commission Allotment
Cherokee Connections
History of the Cherokee Indians
Indian Deeds: In Plymouth Colony
The Indian Tribes of North America
Henry Schoolcraft, With the Indians
Minnesota Native Americans, 1823
Minnesota Native Americans, 1851
Nebraska Pawnee Scouts, 1861-69
Oklahoma Osage Tribe Roll, 1921
B. D. Wilson, Report on CA Indians 
Indian Affairs, Laws and Treaties


While we know our northern friends may not feel it, in the South, Spring is here. So we thought we'd share a few of our gardening sites appropriate for this time of the year. Along with gardening, there's grilling, and getting ready to diet so that you can fit back into that bathing suit this summer!

 

 

 

Bannock Indian Tribe History


Wastawana

Bannock (from Panaílǐ, their own name).
     A Shoshonean tribe whose habitat pre
vious to being gathered on reservations can not be definitely outlined. There were two geographic divisions, but references to the Bannock do not always note this distinction. The home of the chief division appears to have been southeast Idaho, whence they ranged into western Wyoming. The country actually claimed by the chief of this southern division, which seems to have been recognized by the treaty of Ft Bridger, July 3, 1868, lay between lat. 42° and 45°, and between long. 113° and the main chain of the Rocky Mountains. It separated the Wihinasht Shoshoni of western Idaho from the so-called Washaki band of Shoshoni of western Wyoming. They were found in this region in 1859, and they asserted that

this had been their home in the past. Bridger (Ind. Aff. Rep., 363, 1859) had known them in this region as early as 1829.
     Bonneville
found them in 1833 on Portneuf River, immediately north of the present Ft Hall reservation. Many of this division affiliated with the Washaki Shoshoni, and by 1859 had extensively intermarried with them. Ft Hall reservation was set apart by Executive order in 1869, and 600 Bannock, in addition to a large number of Shoshoni, consented to remain upon it. Most of them soon wandered away, however, and as late as 1874 an appropriation was made to enable the Bannock and Shoshoni scattered in southeast Idaho to be moved to the reservation.
     The Bannock at Ft Hall were said
to number 422 in 1885. The northern division was found by Gov. Stevens in 1853 (Pac. R. R. Rep., 1, 329, 1855) living on Salmon River in eastern Idaho. Lewis and Clark, who passed through the country of this north division in 1805, may have included them under the general term Shoshoni, unless, as is most likely, these are the Broken Moccasin Indians they mention (Expel., Coues ed., II, 523, 1893). In all probability these Salmon River Bannock had recently crossed the mountains from the eastward owing to pressure of the Siksika, since they claimed as their territory southwest Montana, including the rich areas in which are situated Virginia City, Bozeman, and other towns (Ind. Aff. Rep., 289, 1869). Stevens (1853) states that they had been more than decimated by the ravages of smallpox and the inroads of the Siksika. It is probable that at no distant time in the past, perhaps before they had acquired horses, the various groups of the entire Bannock tribe were united in one locality in southeast Idaho, where they were neighbors of the Shoshoni proper, but their language is divergent from the latter.
     The Bannock
were a widely roving tribe, a characteristic which favored their dispersal and separation into groups. Both the men and the women are well developed; and although Shoshonean in language, in physical characters the Bannock resemble more closely the Shahaptian Nez Percé than other Shoshonean Indians. Kroeber reports that the language of the Fort Hall Bannock connects them closer with the Ute than with any other Shoshonean tribe. At the same time Powell and Mooney report that the tribes of west Nevada consider the Bannock very nearly related to themselves.
     The loss of hunting lands, the diminution of the bison herds, and the failure of the Government to render timely relief led to a Bannock outbreak in 1878, the trouble having been of long standing. During the exciting times of the Nez Percé war the Bannock were forced to remain on their inhospitable reservation, to face the continued encroachment of the whites, and to subsist on goods provided from an appropriation amounting to 2½ cents per capita per diem.
     During the summer a drunken Indian of the tribe shot and wounded two teamsters; the excitement and bitter feeling caused by his arrest, Nov. 23, 1877, resulted in the killing of an agency employee. Troops were called for, and the murderer was pursued, captured, tried, and executed. This episode so in­creased the excitement of the Indians that, fearing what was assumed to be threatening demonstrations, the troops surrounded and captured two Bannock camps in Jan., 1878; but most of the Indians were afterward released. On account of insufficient food the Bannock left the reservation in the spring and went to Camas Prairie, where they killed several settlers. A vigorous campaign under Gen. Howard resulted in the capture of about 1,000 of them in August, and the outbreak came to an end after a fight on Sept. 5, at Clark's ford, where 20 Bannock lodges were attacked and all the women and children killed.
     Bridger states that when he first knew them (about 1829) the southern Bannock numbered 1,200 lodges, indicating a population of about 8,000. In 1869 they were estimated as not exceeding 500, and this number was probably an overestimate as their lodges numbered but 50, indicating a population of about 350. In 1901 the tribe numbered 513, so intermixed, however, with the Shoshoni that no attempt is made to enumerate them separately. All the Bannock except 92 under Lemhi agency are gathered on Ft Hall reservation, Idaho. Practically nothing is known of the former organization of the Bannock or of their divisions. The names of four divisions were obtained by Hoffman, and a fifth is given by Schoolcraft. These are:
Kutshundika, or Buffalo-eaters
Penointikara, or Honev-eaters
Shohopanaiti, or
Cottonwood Bannock
Yambadika, or
Root-eaters
Waradika, or Rye-grass­
seed-eaters

Index of Tribes or Nations

 


  Add/correct a link

Submit Genealogy Data

  Join GenGuide

Comments


Copyright 2004-2008, by Access Genealogy.com