|
His Character, Moral and General
It is often claimed for the
Indian that, before the white man put him in the way of a
freer indulgence of his unhappy craving for drink, he was as
moral a being as one unrenewed by Divine grace could be expected to be.
Unfortunately, this statement involves no definition of what
might be considered moral, under the circumstances. Now, there
will be disagreeing estimates of what a moral character, upon
which there has been no descent of heavenly grace, or where
grace has not supervened to essay its recreation, or its molding
anew, should be; and there will also, I think, be divergent
views as to a code of morals to be practiced which shall comport
with the exhibition of a reasonably seemly morality. I cannot,
at least, concur in that definition of a moral character, upon
which no operation of Divine grace has been expended, for its
raising or its beautifying, which accepts that of the pagan
Indian as its highest expression; and, distinctly, hesitate to
affirm that a high moral instinct inheres in the Indian, or that
such is permitted to dominate his mind; and, when I find one of
these very writers who claim for him a high inborn morality,
discovering in him such indwelling monsters as revenge,
mercilessness, implacability, the affirmation falters not the
less upon my tongue. That very many of the graver crimes laid at
the Indian's door, and the revolting heinousness of which the
records of our courts reveal; may be traced to his prescribing
for himself, and practicing, a lax standard of morals, is a
statement which it would be idle to dispute. That the marriage
tie exacts from him not the most onerous of interpretations, and
that the scriptural basis for a sound morality, involved in the
declaration, "and they twain shall be one flesh," not seldom
escapes, in his case, its full and due honoring, are, likewise,
affirmations not susceptible of being refuted. That, for
instance, is not a high notion of marital constancy (marital is
scarcely the term, for I am speaking now of the pagan, who
rejects the idea of marriage, though often, I confess, living
happily and uninterruptedly with the woman of his choice) which
permits the summary disruption of the bond between man and
woman; nor is paternal responsibility rigorously defined by one,
who causes to cease, at will, his labor and care for, and
support of, his children, leaving the reassuring of these to
those children contingent upon the mother finding some one else
to give them and herself a home.
To follow a lighter vein for a moment. The Police
Magistrate at Brantford, before whom many of these little
domesticities come for their due appreciation (for they
disclose, often, elements of really baffling complexity) not
less than their ventilation and unravelling, is an eminently
peace-loving man, and quite an adept at patching up such-like
conjugal trifles. He will dispense from his tribunal sage
advice, and prescribe remedial measures, which shall have untold
efficacy, in dispelling mutual mistrust, restoring mutual
confidence, and bringing about a lasting re-union. He will
interpose, like some potent magician, to transform a discordant,
recriminating, utterly unlovely couple, into a pair of harmless,
peaceable, love-consumed doves. There rises before my mind a
case for illustration. A couple lived on the Reserve, whose
domestic life had become so completely embittered that every
vestige of old-time happiness had fled. The agency of the Police
Magistrate was sought to decree terms of separation, as there
was an adamantine resolve on the part of each to no longer live
with the other. Thus, in a frame of mind altogether repelling
the notion of conversion to gentler views, or the idea of
laudable endeavor, on the part of another, to instil milder
counsels, being availingly expended, they repaired to the Police
Magistrate's office. He, by invoking old recollections on either
side, and judiciously inviting them to a retrospection of their
former mutual courtesies, and early undimmed pleasures,
gradually brought the would-be sundered people to a wiser mind.
I believe there have only been two or three outbursts of
domestic infelicity since.
Certain notions, bound up with the Indian's practice, in
times now happily passed away, of polygamy, may be construed
into an advocacy of the Deceased Wife's Sister's Bill, which
engaged the attention of Parliament last session, and bids fair
to take up the time and thought of our legislators, in sessions
yet to come. The Indian usually sought to marry two sisters,
holding that the children of the one would be loved and cared
for more by the other than if the wives were not related. The
concurrent existence of both mothers is, of course, presumed
here. The question remains to be asked, would the children of
the one sister, were their mother dead, be as well loved and
cared for by the surviving sister, were she called upon to
exercise the functions of a step-mother; and would the children
of the dead sister love the children of the living sister, were
they not viewed upon the same footing as those children?
That the Indian, the Christian Indian, frequently
contemns the means unsparingly used, and the attempts and
arguments put forth, by his spiritual overseers, to restrain his
immoral propensities, to bridle his immoral instinct, and to
ameliorate and elevate, generally, his moral tone, I fear, will
not be gainsaid. That very many, on the other hand, practice a
high morality, and set before themselves an exalted conception
of conjugal duty, and strive, with a full-hearted earnestness,
to fulfill that conception, none would-be so blind or so unjust
as to deny.
There are some features in the Indian character to
which unstinted praise is due, and shall be rendered.
He is very hospitable; and (herein nobly conserving his
traditions) it is in no wise uncommon for him to resign the best
of the rude comforts he has, in the way of accommodation, to
some belated one, and content himself with the scantest of those
scant comforts, impressing, at the same time, with his native
delicacy, the notion, that he courts, rather than shrinks from,
the almost penitential regime. Though one would naturally think,
that the scorn of material comforts, suggested here, and which
many others of his acts evince, would scarcely breed indolence
in the Indian, yet this is with him an almost unconquerable
weakness. It is, indeed, so ingrained within him, as to resist
any attempt, on his own part, to excise it from his economy; and
as to defy extirpating or uprooting process sought to be
enforced by another. The Indian is, in truth, a supremely
indolent being, and testifying to an utter abandonment of
himself to the power of indolence over him, has often been
known, when recourse solely to the chase was permitted him for
the filling of his larder, to delay his steps to the forest,
until the gnawing pangs of hunger should drive him there, as
offering him the only plan for their appeasing.
When I have said that the Indian is hospitable, I have
said that he is kind and considerate, for these are involved
with the other. He has much of native delicacy and politeness;
and though, from deep-seated prepossession, he denies the woman
equal footing with himself; and, though through misconception of
woman's true purpose and mission in the world, or through
failing to apprehend that higher, greater, more palpable
helpfulness she brings to man (all these, because self-dictated,
self-enforced) he commits to her much of the drudgery, and
imposes upon her many of the heavy burdens, of life, the Indian
is not wholly devoid of chivalric instinct.
He is usually reticent in his manner with strangers,
(but this is readily explained by his imperfect command of
English, and his reluctance to expose his deficiency) though
voluble to the last degree when he falls in with his own people.
The Indian has been lauded and hymned by Longfellow and
others as the hunter par excellence; but, to apply this to his
present condition, and look there for its truth, would be idle.
The incitements to indulge his taste for hunting are now so few,
and of such slight potency, and the opportunities for giving it
play so narrowed down, and so rare, that the pursuit of the
chase has become well-nigh obsolete, and something to him
redolent only, as it were, with the breath of the past. As the
Indian is at present circumstanced and environed, he can beat up
little or no game, and his poverty frequently putting out of his
reach the procuring of the needful sporting gear, where he does
follow hunting, it is pursued with much-weakened ardor, and
often bootless issue. He is moved now to its pursuit, solely
with the hope of realizing a paltry gain from the sale of the
few prizes he may secure.
Though his reputation as a hunter has so mournfully
declined, the Indian is yet skilled in tracking rabbits, in the
winter season, the youth, particularly, finding this a pleasant
diversion. I trust I do not invoke the hasty ire of the
sportsman if, in guilelessness of soul, I call this hunting.
This very circumscribing of the occasions, and inefficacy of the
motive powers, for engaging in hunting, will tend, it is hoped,
to correct the indolent habits that the Indian nurses, and the
inveteracy of which I have just dwelt upon, and emphasized; for
it will not, I think, be denied that his former full-hearted
pursuit of the chase (in submission, largely though it was, to
imperious calls of nature), is responsible, mainly, for the
inherence of this unpleasing trait. Though, of course, hunting
in its very nature, enforces a certain activity, it is an
activity, so far as any beneficent impressing of the character
is concerned, void of wholesomeness, and barren of solid,
lasting results; and, viewed in this way, an activity really
akin to indolence. With the craving for hunting subdued, the
Indian may take up, with less distraction, and devote himself,
to good advantage, to his farming, and to industrial callings.
Want of energy and of steadiness of purpose are with
the Indian conspicuous weaknesses, and their bearing upon his
farming operations may be briefly noticed. He will not devote
himself to his work in the fields with that full-intentioned
mind to put in an honest day's toil, that the white man brings
to his work, often being beguiled, by some outside pleasure or
amusement, into permitting his day's work to sustain a break,
which he laments afterwards in a melancholy refrain, of farming
operations behind, and domestic matters unhinged, generally.
Though the white has endeavored (and I the more gladly bear my
witness to these attempts at the redemption of the Indian from
some of his weaknesses, since the white has been so freely
charged with ministering to his appetite for drink, and to the
evil side of his nature generally) to infuse these qualities of
energy and resolution into the Indian, my observation has not
yet discerned them in him. Though irresolute himself, the Indian
will not tolerate, but is sufficiently warm in his
disapprobation, of any unmanly surrender to weakness or
vacillation on the part of whites set in authority over him.
He imbibes freely (I fear the notion of a certain
physiological process is embraced by some minds, and that these
words will be taken as curtly enunciating the Indian's besetting
weakness; but pray be not too eager to dissever them from what
is yet to come, as I protest that I am not now wishing to revert
to this sad failing). He imbibes freely--the current fashions of
the hour amongst whites. If raffling, for instance, be held in
honor as a method for expediting the sale of personal effects,
the Indian will adapt the practice to the disposal of every
conceivable chattel that he desires to get off his hands.
This site
includes some historical materials that may imply negative stereotypes
reflecting the culture or language of a particular period or place. These
items are presented as part of the historical record and should not be
interpreted to mean that the WebMasters in any way endorse the stereotypes
implied . A Treatise of the Six Nation Indians
Six Nation Indians
Free
Genealogy |
Indian
Genealogy
|
Six Nation Indians
|
|