|
History of
Gesture Language
This is a fair example of the critical
acumen of art-commentators. The gestures of
the two nymphs are interesting, but on very
slight examination it appears that those of
Galené have nothing to do with beat of drum,
nor have those of Eudia any connection with
music, though it is not so clear what is the
true subject under discussion. Aided,
however, by the light of the modern sign
language of Naples, there seems to be by no
means serenity prevailing, but a quarrel
between the ladies, on a special subject
which is not necessarily pure. The nymph at
the reader's left fixes her eyes upon her
companion with her index in the same
direction, clearly indicating, thou. That
the address is reproachful is shown from her
countenance, but with greater certainty from
her attitude and the corresponding one of
her companion, who raises both her hands in
surprise accompanied with negation. The
latter is expressed by the right hand raised
toward the shoulder, with the palm opposed
to the person to whom response is
 |
made. This is the rejection of the idea
presented, and is expressed by some of our
Indians, as shown in Fig. 65. A sign of the
Dakota tribe of Indians with the same
signification is given in Fig. 270, page
441, infra. At the same time the
upper part of the nymph's body is
drawn backward as far as the
preservation of equilibrium permits.
So a reproach or accusation is made
on the one part, and denied, |
| whether truthfully or not, on
the other. Its subject also may be
ascertained. The left hand of Eudia
is not mute; it is held towards her
rival with the balls of the index
and thumb united, the modern
Neapolitan sign for love, which is
drawn more clearly in Fig. 66. It is
called the kissing of the thumb and
finger, and there is ample authority
to show that among the ancient
classics it was a sign of marriage. St. Jerome, quoted by Vincenzo Requena,
says: "Nam et ipsa digitorum conjunctio,
et quasi molli osculo se complectans et
fśderans, maritum pingit et conjugem;"
and Apuleius clearly alludes |
 |
| to the same gesture
as used in the adoration of Venus,
by the words "primore digito in erectum
pollicem residente." The gesture is one
of the few out of the large number
described in various parts of
Rabelais' great work, the
significance of which is explained.
It is made by Naz-de-cabre or Goat's Nose (Pantagruel,
Book III, Ch. XX), who lifted up into the
air his left hand, the whole fingers whereof
he retained fistways closed together, except
the thumb and the forefinger, whose nails he
softly joined and coupled to one another. "I
understand, quoth Pantagruel, what he
meaneth by that sign. It denotes marriage."
The quarrel is thus established to be about
love; and the fluting satyr seated between
the two nymphs, behind whose back the
accusation is furtively made by the jealous
one, may well be the object concerning whom
jealousy is manifested. Eudia therefore,
instead of "serenely" marking time for a
"tranquil" tympanist, appears to be crying,
"Galené! you bad thing! you are having, or
trying to have, an affair with my Comus!"—an
accusation which this writer verily believes
to have been just. The lady's attitude in
affectation of surprised denial is not that
of injured innocence. |
|

Group from a vase in the Homeric Gallery.
|
| Fig. 67, taken from a vase in the Homeric
Gallery, is rich in natural gestures.
Without them, from the costumes and
attitudes it is easy to recognize the
protagonist or principal actor in the group,
and its general subject. The warrior goddess
Athené stands forth
in the midst of what appears to be a council
of war. After the study of modern gesture
speech, the votes of each member of the
council, with the degree of positiveness or
interest felt by each, can be ascertained.
Athené in animated motion turns her eyes to
the right, and extends her left arm
and hand to the left, |
 |
with her right hand brandishing
a lance in the same direction, in
which her feet show her to be ready
to spring. She is urging the figures
on her right to follow her at once
to attempt some dangerous
enterprise. Of these the elderly
man, who is calmly |
| seated, holds his right hand
flat and reversed, and suspended
slightly above his knee. This
probably is the ending of the modern
Neapolitan gesture, Fig. 68, which
signifies hesitation, advice to
pause before hasty action, "go
slowly," and commences higher with a
gentle wavering movement downward.
This can be compared with the sign
of some of our Indians, Fig. 69, for wait! slowly! The female figure
at the left of the group, standing firmly
and decidedly, raises her left hand directed
to the goddess with the palm vertical. If
this is supposed to be a stationary gesture
it means, "wait! stop!" It may,
however, be the commencement of the last
mentioned gesture, "go slow." |
 |
| Both of these members of the council advise
delay and express doubt of the propriety of
immediate action. |
 |
The sitting warrior on the left of Athené
presents his left hand flat and carried well
up. This position, supposed to be
stationary, now means to ask, inquire,
and it may be that he inquires of
the other |
| veteran what reasons he can
produce for his temporizing policy.
This may be collated with the modern
Neapolitan sign for ask, Fig. 70,
and the |
 |
 |
common Indian sign for "tell me!"
Fig. 71. In connection with this it is also
interesting to compare the Australian sign
for interrogation, Fig. 72, and also the
Comanche Indian sign for give me,
Fig. 301, page 480, infra. If,
however, the artist had the
intention to represent the flat hand
as in motion from |
| below upward, as is
probable from the connection, the
meaning is much,
greatly. He strongly disapproves the
counsel of the opposite side. Our Indians
often express the idea of quantity, much,
with the same conception of comparative
height, by an upward motion of the extended
palm, but with them the palm is held
downward. The last figure to the right, by
the action of his whole body, shows his
rejection of the proposed delay, and his
right hand gives the modern sign of combined
surprise and reproof. |
It is interesting to note the similarity of
the merely emotional gestures and attitudes
of modern Italy with those of the classics.
The Pulcinella, Fig. 73, for instance, drawn
from life in the streets of Naples, has the
same pliancy and abandon of the limbs
as appears in the supposed foolish slaves of
the Vatican Terence.
In close connection with this branch
of the study reference must be made
to the gestures exhibited in the
works of Italian art only modern in
comparison with the high antiquity
of their predecessors. A good
instance is in the Last Supper of
Leonardo da Vinci, painted toward
the close of the fifteenth century,
and to the figure of Judas as there
portrayed. The gospel denounces him
as a thief, which is expressed in
the |
 |
 |
painting by the hand extended
and slightly curved; imitative of
the pilferer's act in clutching and
drawing toward him furtively the
stolen object, and is the same
gesture that now indicates theft
in Naples, Fig. 74, and among some
of the North American Indians, Fig.
75. The pictorial propriety of the
sign is preserved by the apparent
desire of the traitor to obtain the
one white loaf of bread on the table
(the remainder being of coarser
quality) |
| which lies near where his hand
is tending. Raffaelle was equally
particular in his exhibition of
gesture language, even unto the
minutest detail of the arrangement
of the fingers. It is traditional
that he |
 |
| sketched the
Madonna's hands for the Spasimo
di Sicilia in eleven different positions
before he was satisfied. No allusion to the bibliography of gesture
speech, however slight, should close without
including the works of Mgr. D. De Haerne,
who has, as a member of the Belgian Chamber
of Representatives, in addition to his rank
in the Roman Catholic Church, been active in
promoting the cause of education in general,
and especially that of the deaf and dumb.
His admirable treatise The Natural Language
of Signs has been translated and is
accessible to American readers in the
American Annals of the Deaf and Dumb, 1875.
In that valuable serial, conducted by Prof.
E.A. Fay, of the National Deaf Mute College
at Washington, and now in its twenty-sixth
volume, a large amount of the current
literature on the subject indicated by its
title can be found.
Previous |
Indian Sign
Language |
This site includes some historical
materials that may imply negative stereotypes reflecting the culture or
language of a particular period or place. These items are presented as
part of the historical record and should not be interpreted to mean that
the WebMasters in any way endorse the stereotypes implied.
Sign Language
Among North American Indians Compared with
that Among Other Peoples and Deaf-Mutes,
1881
Free
Genealogy |
Indian
Genealogy |
Indian Sign Language
|
|