|
The Mental Type of the Indian Race
1. Has the race claims to a peculiarity of type?
2. Sun worship.
3. Sacred fire.
4. Oriental doctrine of Good and Evil.
5. Idea of the germ of creation under the symbol of an egg.
6. Doctrines of the Magi.
7. Duality of the soul.
8. Metempsychosis.
9. Omens from the flight of birds.
10. Images and omens drawn from the sky.
11. Indian philosophy of Good and Evil.
12. Theology of the Indian jugglers and hunter priests.
13. Great antiquity of oriental knowledge.
14. Nature and objects of Brahminical worship.
15. Antiquities of America.
16. Antiquities of the United States.
17. Antiquity of philological proof.
18. Hindoo Theology.
19. Eternity of life.
20. Difficulty of comparing savage and civilized nations.
21. A dualistic deity.
22. Worship of the elements. Transmigration.
23. What stock of nations?
24. Cast. Incineration of the body.
25. Offerings to ancestors.
26. Offerings at meals, or on journeys.
27. Parallelism of idolatrous customs among the Jews.
28. Extreme antiquity of Hindoo rites.
29. Indian languages. Shemitic.
30. Manners and customs. Mongolic.
31. Conclusions of the early Anglo-Saxons.
32. Permanency of the physiological type.
33. Mental type non-progressive.
34. Proof of orientalism from astronomy.
35. Proof from Aztec astronomy.
1. Do the traits we have been contemplating tend to establish for the Indian
mind and character a type of race which may be deemed as peculiar? It may
further the end in view, to examine this question by the light of their
religious and psychological notions and dogmas; their mythology, and their
conceptions of a Deity. They have also, in the Toltecan group, a calendar and
system of astronomy, and a style of architecture, which are eminently calculated
to arrest attention. More than all, the tribes over the whole continent possess
a class of languages, which, by their principles of grammatical construction,
though running through great changes, vindicate claims to philosophical study.
2. Are their traits, opinions, and idiosyncrasies, indigenous or American; or
are they peculiar to the Indian mind as developed on this continent; and not
derivative from other lands? If so, in what do their original conceptions of art
or science, religion or opinion, consist?
Not in the adoration, or worship of the Sun, certainly!
That idolatrous practice had its origin in Persia, Mesopotamia, and Chaldea;
whence it spread, east and west, nearly the world over. The worship of the Sun
and Moon is mentioned by Job, and was the prevalent idolatry of the land of Uz.
It is also seen that this form of idolatry was charged among the sins of the
Jews, in the days of Ezekiel, as having been introduced secretly in the temple
worship at Jerusalem. (Ezekiel viii. 16.)
Oblations and public thanksgivings were decreed at Rome to the Sun, which was
installed among the multiform gods of that empire. (Tacitus, Vol. III., p. 242.)
Fire was deemed by the followers of Zoroaster as a symbol of the Deity. That
philosopher admitted no other visible object of worship. It was alone the
supreme emblem of divine intelligence.1
Nothing is more notorious than the former prevalence of this worship among the
Peruvian and Mexican tribes; where, however, it was mixed with the practice of
human sacrifices, and the grossest rites. The Aztecs made offerings to the Sun
upon the highest teocalli, and sung hymns to it. Sacred fire was supplied alone
by the priesthood, and it was the foundation of their power.2
North of the Gulf of Mexico, the doctrine prevailed with more of its original
oriental
simplicity, and free from the horrid rites which had marked it in the valley of
Anahuac, and among the spurs of the Andes.
The tribes of the present area of the United States would admit of no temples,
but made their sacred fires in the recesses of the forest. They sung hymns to
the Sun as the symbol of the Great Spirit.3 Such is their present practice in
the forests. They were guilty, it is true, at all periods of their history, of
shocking cruelties to prisoners taken in war, but they never offered them as
sacrifices to the Deity.
3. They never use common fire for uncommon purposes.4 Sacred fire is extracted
on ceremonial occasions by percussion; most commonly with the flint.5 Opwáguns,
or pipes, with the incense of tobacco, are thus lighted whenever their affairs,
or the business in hand, is national, or relates to their secret societies. This
object, so lighted, is first offered by genuflections to the four cardinal
points, and the zenith. It is then handed by the master of ceremonies to the
chiefs and public functionaries present, who are each expected to draw a few
whiffs ceremonially. Sir Alexander Mackenzie has well described this ceremony at
page 97 of his Voyages.
In this primitive practice of having no temples for their worship, extracting
their sacred fire for ceremonial occasions by percussion, and keeping their
worship up to its simple standard of a sort of transcendentalism, as taught by
the oriental nations, to whom we have referred, the Indian tribes of the United
States indicate their claims to a greater antiquity than those of the southern
part of the continent. They appear to have been pushed from their first
positions by tribes of grosser rites and manners.
"The disciples of Zoroaster," says Herodotus, "reject the use of temples, of
altars, and of statues; and smile at the folly of those nations who imagine that
the gods are sprung from, or bear any affinity with the human nature. The tops
of the highest mountains are the places chosen for their sacrifices. Hymns and
prayers are the principal worship. The Supreme God, who fills the wide arch of
heaven, is the object to which they are addressed."6
4. Take another of their dogmas, and try whether it has the character of an
original or derivative belief. "We allude to the two principles of Good and
Evil, for which the Iroquois have the names of Inigorio, the Good mind, and
Inigohahetgea, or the Evil mind. (Vide Cusic's Ancient History of the Six
Nations; also the Wyandot tradition of Oriwahento.)7 This is one of the earliest
oriental beliefs. It was one of the leading dogmas of Zoroaster. Goodness,
according to this philosopher, is absorbed in light;
Evil is buried in darkness. Ormusd is the
principle of benevolence, true wisdom, and
happiness to men. Ahriman is the author of
malevolence and discord. By his malice he
has long pierced the egg of Ormusd; in other
words, has violated the harmony of the works
of creation.8
Gibbon informs us that the doctrines of
Zoroaster had been so greatly corrupted that
Artaxerxes ordered a great council of the
magi to revise them, by whom it was settled
on the basis of the two great and
fundamental principles denoted.9
The North American tribes of our latitudes
appear to have felt that the existence of
evil in the world was incompatible with that
universal benevolence and goodness which
they ascribe to the Merciful Great Spirit.
Iroquois theology meets this question: they
account for it by supposing, at the
creation, the birth of two antagonistical
Powers of miraculous energy, but subordinate
to the Great Spirit, one of whom is
perpetually employed to restore the discords
and mal-adaptations, in the visible
creation, of the other.10
The earliest notice we have of this doctrine, among the United States tribes, is
in the journal of a voyage to North America in 1721 by P. de Charlevoix, (Vol.
2, page 143,) in which he mentions the theology of the Iroquois, the descent of
Atahentsic, and the birth of the antagonistical infants. It is more fully stated
by Cusic, in 1825, and by Oriwahento, in 1837, as above referred to.
5. The idea of the allegory of the egg of Ormusd has been disclosed, in the
progress of western settlements, by the discovery of an earthwork situated on
the summit of a hill in Adams County, Ohio.11 This hill is one hundred and fifty
feet above the surface of Brush Creek. It represents the coil of a serpent seven
hundred feet long; but, it is thought, would reach, if deprived of its curves,
one thousand feet. The jaws of the serpent are represented as widely distended,
as if in the act of swallowing. In the interstice is an oval, or egg-shaped
mound. The oriental notion, thus depicted, is too peculiar to render it probable
that it originated here.
6. Thus far, the beliefs of the more northerly of our tribes appear to be of a
Chaldee-Persic character.12 It is no proof that nations have been necessarily
connected in their history because they coincide in the rites of sun worship.
Other traits must also coincide. But, to those who object to the idea of the
worship of the sun and moon as a natural species of idolatry for barbarous
nations to select, between whom, however, no previous connexion or intercourse
necessarily existed, it is replied, that this idea did not propagate itself
west, with the idolatrous Scythians, at least, beyond Rome, where Sylla
established the rite of an eternal Fire; nor did it re-appear among the
Celts, Cimbri, Teutons, Iberians, Selavoniaus, and other tribes who filled all
Europe, to its extent in Scandinavia and the British isles. Nor do we find that
the doctrine of the TWO PRINCIPLES of Good and Evil, so extensively believed by
the nations of Central Asia, were spread at all in that direction. The Celtic
priests had no such notions, nor do we hear of them among the worshippers of
Odin: they both had an entirely different mythology. It is remarkable that there
was no sun worship in the area of Western Europe. The propagation of the
doctrines of the Magi appears to have been among the tribes east and south of
the original seats of their power and influence. Egypt had them as early as the
Exodus; and it has been seen that the idolatrous tribes of Chaldea were addicted
to the worship of the sun and moon.13
7. It has been found that the Indians of the United States believe in the
duality of the soul. This ancient doctrine is plainly announced as existing
among the Algonquins, in connection with, and as a reason for, the custom of the
deposit of food with the dead, and of leaving an opening in the grave covering,
which is a very general custom.14 All our tribes make such deposits of viands.
8. They also believe in the general doctrine of the metempsychosis, or
transmigration of souls. Pythagoras is supposed to have got his first notions on
the subject, from the Egyptian priests, and the recluse Brahmins. But wherever
he imbibed the notion, he transmitted it as far as his name had influence.15 The
notions of the northern tribes on this subject are shown incidentally in the
oral tales which I first began to collect among the Algonquins and Dacotas in
1822, and which are embodied in Algic Researches.16 The soul of man is seen, in
these curious legends, to be thought immortal and undying, the vital spark
passing from one object to another. This object of the new life in general is
not man, but some species of the animated creation; or even, it may be, for a
time, animate object. The circumstances, which determine this change, do not
appear. "Nor can it be affirmed, that the doctrine is parallel, in all respects,
to the theory of the Samian philosopher. It would seem that the superior will of
the individual, as a spiritually possessed person, himself determined the form
of his future life.
9. Great attention is paid by the North American Indians to the flight of birds,
whose motions in the upper regions of the atmosphere are considered ominous.
Those of the carnivorous species are deemed indicative of events in war, and
they are the symbols employed in their war-songs, and extemporaneous chants. The
gathering of these species, to fatten upon dead bodies left upon the field of
battle, is the image strongly thrown forward, in their chants, and these warlike
Pe-na-si-wug are deemed to be ever prescient of the times and places of
conflict, which are denoted by their flight. As the carnivora are familiar with
the upper currents of the atmosphere,
where their gods of the air dwell, their association, in the Indian mind, with
these deities of battle, as messengers to carry intelligence, is a general
belief. But no trace of omens, derived from the examination, after death, of
entrails of any kind, as denoting futurity, a custom so prevalent among the
ancients, has ever been found, or is believed to exist.
10. Minute observation is also bestowed by them upon the meteorology of the
clouds. Their size, their color, their motions, their relative position to the
sun and to the horizon, form the subject of a branch of knowledge, which is in
the hands of their medas and prophets. Important events are often decided by
predictions founded on such observations. The imagery of this exalted view of
the celestial atmosphere, with its starry back-ground, and its warfare of
thunder, lightning, electricity, aurora borealis, and storms, is very much
employed in their personal names. This imagery is capable of being graphically
seized on, by their transpositive languages, and is highly poetic. The habit of
such observation, has evidently been nurtured by living for ages, as the race
has, in the open air, and without houses to obscure every possible variety of
atmospheric juxtaposition and display.
11. We might continue this discussion of opinions and beliefs which appear to
lie hidden in the mythology of the Indian mind, or are only brought out in an
incidental manner, and which appear not to have had an indigenous origin; but we
should do great injustice to the Indian character, not to mention by far the
most prominent of their beliefs, so far as they govern his daily practices. We
allude to the doctrine of Manitoes, or what may be denominated Manitology. And
here appears to be the strongest ground for originality of conception. All the
tribes have some equivalent to this; We use the Algonquin word, because that is
best known. The word Manito, when not used with a prefix or accent, does not
mean the Deity, or Great Spirit. It is confined to a spiritual, or mysterious
power. The doctrine that a man may possess such a power is well established in
the belief of all the tribes. All their priests and prophets assert the
possession of it, but the possession is not believed, by even the blindest
zealot or impostor, to be supreme, or equal to that of the Great Merciful
Spirit, or diurgic deity. A man may fast to obtain this power. The initial fast
at the age of puberty, which every Indian undergoes, is for light to be
individually advertised and become aware of this personal Manito. When revealed
in dreams, his purpose is accomplished, and he adopts that revelation, which is
generally some bird or animal, as his personal or guardian Manito. He trusts in
it in war and peace; and there is no exigency in life, in or from which he
believes it cannot help or extricate him. The misfortune is, for his peace and
welfare of mind, that these Manitoes are not of equal and harmonious power. One
is constantly supposed to be "stronger," or to have greater spiritual powers
than another. Hence, the Indian is never sure that his neighbor is not under the
guardianship of a Manito stronger than his own.
This is not half the worst of the doctrine. There are malignant, as well as
benevolent Manitoes. Here the TWO PRINCIPLES of Good and Evil, which we have
discussed as of oriental origin, develope themselves. The evil Manito is
constantly exercising his power to counteract or overreach the good. And thus
the Indian, who believes in a passive Great Spirit, or Gezha Manito, with no
other attributes but goodness and ubiquity, is left in a perpetual and horrible
state of fear. His Great Spirit is believed to rule the earth and the sky, and
to be the WA-ZHA-WAUD, or maker of the world; but he leaves these two
antagonistical classes of Manitoes to war with each other, and to counteract
each other s designs, to fill the world with turmoil, and, in fact, to govern
the moral destinies of mankind.
We thus have the doctrine of Ormusd and Ariman, of the oriental world,
reproduced in another form, but one not less fraught with elements to disturb
the harmony of creation, to pierce the egg of Ormusd, and to render the life of
the simple believer in this dogma an unending scene of discord, dismay, and
tumult.
12. There is no attempt by the hunter, priesthood, jugglers, or powwows, which
can be gathered from their oral traditions, to impute to the great Merciful
Spirit the attribute of justice, or to make man accountable to Him, here or
hereafter, for aberrations from virtue, good will, truth, or any form of moral
right. With benevolence and pity as prime attributes, the Great Transcendental
Spirit of the Indian does not take upon himself a righteous administration of
the world s affairs, but, on the contrary, leaves it to be filled, and its
affairs, in reality, governed, by demons and fiends in human form. Here is the
Indian theology. Every one will see how subtile it is; how well calculated to
lead the uninformed hunter mind captive, and make it ever fearful; and how
striking a coincidence its leading dogma of the two opposing principles of Good
and Evil affords, with the oriental doctrines to which we have referred.
13. It is difficult to introduce comparisons between the barbarous tribes of
America, and the existing civilized races of Asia. The latter, east of the
Indus, at least, and bordering on the Indian Ocean, are called non-progressive
races; but they possess a type of civilization, founded on agriculture, arts,
and letters, which is very ancient. They have practiced the science of numbers
and astronomy from the earliest times. Most, or all of them, have alphabets. The
cuneiform character was in use in the days of Darius Hystaspes.17 Many of the
arts are supposed to have had their origin there. The use of iron among them is
without date. Their systems of religious philosophy were committed to writing,
if not put in print, before America was discovered. The Chinese knew the art of
printing, before it was discovered in Europe. They were acquainted with the
powers of the magnet, and the mariner s compass.18 Naval architecture has
belonged to the Chinese and Japanese, time out of mind.19 The Hindostanees built
temples in India of enormous magnitude and exact proportions, long, it is
believed, before the use of Egyptian or Grecian architecture. The sword, the
spear, the bow and arrow, and the shield and
banner, came into their hands from the
earliest days of the Assyrian, Chaldean, and
Persian monarchies.20
14. From Professor Wilson s Lectures on the Hindus, the religious system and
practices of these nations are based upon a confused notion of God, but have
degenerated into the most monstrous and sublime absurdities. Their systems are,
one and all, ideal, contemplative, full of mysticism, and extravagantly
transcendental. They have not, like the Greeks, so much deified men and made
gods of heroes, as they have shown a proneness to deify events, powers, and
attributes. The creation, the preservation, and the regeneration, or
reproductive powers of man, are worshipped symbolically in different phases, as
the FIRST CAUSE. Brahma is creation, Vishnu preservation, and Siva reproduction,
among the Hindus.21 Setting out with an idea of Monotheism, they have in this way
multiplied their objects of adoration, till they are the most subtile and
extravagant polytheists on the globe. Thirty thousand gods have the Hindus
alone. All the elements are deified, and their worship has become proverbial for
the gross character of its idolatry.
15. Many have supposed that the oriental arts and knowledge were transferred to
this continent at early epochs, and have beheld evidence of this in the ruins of
temples, teocalli, and other structures and vestiges of ancient art, scattered
over the country. We shall know more of this, when we come to find and decipher
inscriptions. As yet, very little is known, scientifically, of American ruins
and monuments of antiquity. We have done very little beyond the popular
description of certain remains of ancient architecture. The first accounts of
Del Rio of the ruins of Palenque, electrified the antiquarian world.
Views and descriptions of the buildings and
temples of a former race in Central America
and Yucatan, served to confirm this.
Generally, very high-toned theories were in
vogue, in speaking of the ancient period of
American civilization. The descriptions of
Stephens, and the artistic views of
Catherwood, have done much to render the
existence of these ruins in Central America
and Yucatan an element of popular knowledge.
In our own country, Mr. Norman has added to
this diffusion. In Europe, the spread of
this knowledge has been in the hands of men
of research. Denmark has stepped forward, to
separate the era of the Scandinavian, from
the other ruins and vestiges of ancient
occupancy.22
16. In the United States, there has been much speculation upon our mounds and
earth works, from the era of Mr. Jefferson s Notes on Virginia, in 1778, to the
present day. Generally, the remarks, with much, but various degrees of merit,
have wanted elementariness, and not unfrequently seem open to the criticism of
high theories upon very slender materials. There has been some attempt, it would
seem, by ancient
hands in the south, to imitate the gigantic piles of the Euphrates and the Nile.
The type of the teocalli and terraced pyramid cannot be successfully sought,
short of these localities. But our ruins are wholly without the oriental
inscriptive arts of these early structures of mankind. M. Jomard has, indeed,
identified Lybian characters in one of the tumuli of the Ohio valley.23 The
knowledge of the inhabitants of Persia, of India, and of China, is very ancient.
We are not authorized to conclude that the ignorant only migrate.
17. Races of men carry with them two generic traits, namely, arts and ideas. The
latter are the most ancient, for a man must have the conception of a thing
before he can construct the thing itself. Opinions, therefore, of God, of
worship, of astronomy, in fine, the pre-thoughts or principles of every art and
science, should be sought as the earliest evidences of the connections and
affinities of races. Thought and words are older than works. This truth gives to
philology, as a proof of antiquity, its best claim. Races, who thought in a
particular manner, or whose thoughts succeeded each other in a certain fixed
train, spoke grammatically alike. I see a horse, or A horse I see, are phrases
that indicate two classes of syntax.
18. The opinion that there is a God, that matter was created by him, and
continues to exist by his will, is a basis for the Hindu theology, however
corrupted.24 That this power and harmony of the creation is kept up, is
continually opposed to another power, and is in danger of being destroyed by it,
appears to have been one of the earliest philosophical and religious errors.25
Man, as the chief possessor of creation, is subject to this disturbing power.
Heat, air, water, earth, light, and darkness, affect him. Hence his offerings to
them, under various names, in heathen theology and mythology, and the origin of
elemental worship. We have given Zoroaster as the earliest author who is known
as sustaining this theory under the symbols of fire and the sun. The Brahmins
early taught it, worshipping as a primary dogma, as we have stated, the
creation, the continuance, and the propagation of the race as different
hypostases of God: they also enthroned the elements as objects of worship.
19. The Hindus regard the eternity of life as the great evil. Its
indestructibility by death is the grand object from which they seek to be
delivered. There is no rest for the soul: it wanders; it suffers various
transmigrations from one object to another; and is the great burthen to be
dropped. Pythagoras, as stated and believed by the Greeks, is known to have
taken this notion from the Brahmins. It is clear, from the writings of the
Sanscrit professor at Oxford, that they anciently taught, and now practice it,
as one of the prime elements of their theology. They teach, also, a succession
of creations or worlds.
20. We have said that it is difficult to compare the notions of our Indians with
those of the existing orientals: the one is a barbarous race mere hunters,
without knowledge, arts, or letters; the other civilized, and possessing them.
Something may, however, be inferred, from the theory announced, of the antiquity
of thought and ideas.
21. It has been seen, in the course of our discussion, that the Indians of
America worship, with more truth and purity than has been found this side of the
Indus, the Tigris and Euphrates, the being of a universal God, or Manito, who is
called, in the North, the Great, Good, or Merciful Spirit. To his power they
oppose an antagonistical Great, Evil-minded Spirit, who is constantly seeking to
destroy and overturn all good and benevolent measures. This evil power, or
Matchi Manito, is represented or symbolized often by the Serpent; hence gifts
and addresses are made to him by their Medas and Jossakeeds. They also offer
oblations to him directly, as inhabiting the solid earth. They pour out drinks
to him. Thus the ancient oriental notion of a dualistical deity is revealed.
22. It has also been seen that they are worshippers of the elements, of fire,
and the sun; and that hymns and offerings are made to the latter. It has been
shown that their oral traditions contain abundant evidence of the idea of the
metempsychosis, or transmigration of the soul through a wandering series of
existences, human and brutal. These are certainly not American, but foreign and
oriental ideas, and denote an oriental origin.
23. If it be now inquired, Are the North American Indians, then, off-shoots of
an oriental Indian stock, among whom these ideas once prevailed? it is asked,
What stock? The Hindu religious practices and opinions of modern days, if we
seek for comparison there, are very different from those prescribed by the Vidas,
the most ancient authority. Changes have been introduced by the Puranas and
other sacred books of comparatively modern date, so that there are some of their
ancient gods which are utterly unknown to modern worshippers.
24. The idea of caste is
perfectly unknown to the North American
Indian. He does not entertain, but
repudiates the very thought of it. To him
all races are " born equal." The burning of
widows at the funereal pile; the casting of
bodies into any stream, like the Ganges,
whose waters are believed to be sacred;
these are ideas and practice s equally
unknown. The incineration of the bodies of
the dead was not practiced on this
continent, even in the tropics, and is a
rite unknown to the tribes of the United
States. It is said to be practiced in New
Caledonia.26
25. The periodical offering of cakes, libations, flesh, or viands at the grave,
to ancestors, or the Patras of the human race, which is stated to be a custom of
the Hindus, is, however, seen to be an idea incorporated in the practice of the
American, or at least the Algonic Indians. These Indians, believing in the
duality of the soul, and that the soul sensorial abides for a time with the body
in the grave, requiring food for its ghostly existence and journeyings, deposit
meats and other aliment, at
and after the time of interment. This custom is universal, and was one of their
earliest observed traits.27 De Bry mentions a feast to fire, in 1588.
26. Another custom, near akin to it, prevails. They offer pieces of flesh and
viands, at meals and feasts, to their O-git-te-zeem-e-wug, or ancestors. (See
Plate 3.) This duty seems to be obligatory on every Indian in good standing with
his tribe, who has been, so to say, piously instructed by the Medas or his
parents; and the consequence is, he fears to neglect it. Every feast, in fact,
every meal at which there is some particularly savory or extra dish, brings
prominently up this duty of a gift to the spirit of forefathers, or of those
relatives in old times, or newly deceased, who have preceded them to the grave.
The first idea that a grave, or burial-ground, or ad-je-da-tig,28 suggests to
him, is the duty he owes as an honest man, expecting good luck in life, to his
relatives, or O-git-te-zeem-e-wug.
When an Indian falls into the fire, or is partially burned, it is a belief that
the spirits of their ancestors have pushed him into the flames, owing to the
neglect of these pious offerings. Sometimes it is a wife or child that is
believed to be thus pushed. In passing a grave-yard or burial-place where the
remains of his ancestors repose, the Indian is strongly reminded of this pious
duty; and if he has any thing from which a meat or drink-offering can be made,
his feelings make a strong appeal to him to perform it.
An Algonquin, on a certain occasion, was passing at dusk through an extensive
Indian burial-ground, where his O-git-te-zeem-e-wug lay. Believing that the dual
soul abides with the body, his fancy pictured to him two of the " Patras "
sitting between the graves. He had a kettle of whiskey in his hands. He felt
that he could not part with this precious drink, by pouring out even a small
libation. He grasped it the firmer, and hurried on, but cast back a furtive
glance. One of the spirits was on his track. He hurried on, but his ghostly
pursuer gained on him. He determined at once on his course; and letting the
phantom come up close to him, he wheeled round on a sudden, and grasped him. He
looked, and, lo! He held in his arms, not his pursuer or ghostly patra, but a
tall bunch of rushes. The spirit had vanished, and transformed himself to a
plant in an instant. Such are the notions of the Algonquins, and, so far as
known, the North American Indians generally.
27. It is a species of idolatry laid to the charge of the Israelites, that while
they were in the wilderness, they "ate the sacrifices of the dead." (Psalms cvi.
28.) There is hardly a form of eastern idolatry herein alluded to, into which
the Israelites had not, at one time or another, fallen; but the most common,
wide-spread, and oft-recurring rite, was that of burning incense on high places
to imaginary beings, or devils, under the delusive idea of their being gods; the
very trait which is so striking in all our Indian tribes.
28. If Hindostan can be regarded in truth as having contributed to our Indian
stocks at all, it must have been at a very
ancient epoch, before the Vidas were
written; for it is asserted that the present
customs of the Hindoos are corruptions of an
elder system, and are in many things new, or
traceable to those books.29
29. The probability of a Shemitic origin for at least the northern stocks,
revives with the investigation of the principles of their languages. It is
sought to place this study on a broader basis, by the accumulation of
vocabularies and grammars from all the leading stocks. It is already perceived
that the elder philologists employed fragmentary materials; that some of their
generalizations were too hasty; and that there are no amalgamations of diverse
principles of syntax, but, on the contrary, a remarkable oneness; that they are,
in fact, rather una-trsyntheiic than poly-synthetic; not "agglutinated," but
accretive.
30. It was early thought that the manners and customs of the tribes savored much
of the Mongolic or Samoidean type. The tribes of the East Indies, who were in
the mind s eye of the early discoverers, embrace much of that generic type, both
in their physical and moral character. Columbus himself thought so.
On the discovery of the race, as represented by the Caribs of the West Indies,
in 1492, Columbus was so struck with the general resemblance of their
physiological traits to those of the East Indians or Hindustanese, that he at
once called them Indianos. All subsequent observers in that area have concurred
generally with him in this respect. The red skin, the hazel and glazed eye, and
coal-black hair, have continued to our day to be characteristics, even where the
breadth of the cheek bones, modified by artificial craniological pressure, and
the varying stature, and effects of mere latitude and subsistence, fail.
31. Such has also been the observation in North America. Ninety-two years after
the discovery, that is, in 1584, when the first ships sent out by Sir Walter
Raleigh, under his commission from Queen Elizabeth, reached the Virginia coasts,
they landed among a generic family of the red men, differing in language wholly
from the Caribs, but whose physical type was nevertheless essentially the same.
The stock family found in Virginia has since become very well known to us, under
the generic cognomen of Algonquins. Wherever examined, between the original
landings at OCCOQUCW and ROANOKE, and the south capes of the St. Lawrence, they
have revealed the same general physiology. They have reproduced themselves, in
every age of our history, without change. The black, straight hair, the black,
glassy eye, the coffin-shaped face, produced by prominent cheek-bones, and the
peculiar varietetic red color, and fine, soft, inodorous organization of the
epidermis and skin, has been recognized as expressively Indian. Fulness or
lankness of muscle, height or shortness of stature, and weakness or vigor of
vitality, may be considered as the effects of peculiarities of food and climate.
But the traits that preside over and give character to the
muscular mass, show themselves as clearly in the well-fed Osage and Dacotah, and
the stately Algonquin, as in the fish and rabbit-fed Gens de Terre (Muskigo) on
the confines of Canada, or the root-eating Shoshonee of the Rocky Mountains.
32. There must be something permanent in the physical type of the man, which has
produced itself, with such amazing constancy, through all our latitudes, torrid,
tropical, temperate, and frigid. And the facts go nigh to prove that this type
is more prominent and important, as indicative of faithfulness to organic laws
of lineament, and minute corpuscular organization, than is generally supposed.30
At least, the result of three and a half centuries does not, where the blood is
unmixed, much favor the idea of a progressive physical development.
33. Nor is there much to favor the idea of the organization of a new mental
germ. The same indestructibility of type, the same non-progressiveness of the
Indian oriental mind, is perceived in the race in every part of this continent.
A new course of thought led Copernicus and Galileo to infer that the earth
turned daily on its axis before the sun. It led Harvey to conclude that the
blood circulates by an organic propulsion from the human heart. It led Jenner to
believe that one species of virus may destroy the liability to take disease from
a more violent natural effect of another and kindred species. There appears to
be little or nothing of this kind of thought in the Indian mind of either
continent. It appears to have no intellectual propulsion, no analytic
tendencies. It reproduces the same ideas in 1850 as in 1492. But if it has this
want of originality, this want of a disposition to re-examine the truth of its
former opinions or dogmas, is the assimilation to Asiatic arts and sciences
strongly apparent?
34. The ancient Persians had a calendar, consisting of twelve moons of thirty
days each, giving them a year of three hundred and sixty days. They had a cycle
of one hundred and twenty years, and allowed the fragmentary hours of each year
to be heaped up before them, till the close of this cycle, when they added the
accumulated days, to square their chronology. They believed, like the Hebrews
and other oriental nations, that the sun passed every day around the earth.
According to Sir Stamford Raffles, Hindostan and Java had a market-day every
fifth day. The Chinese had a cycle of sixty years. Doctor Morrison states, that
the mode of the latter, in recording their chronology, consisted of two set of
hieroglyphics, comprising what they denominate stems and branches. Their cycle
was divided into sub-periods of ten stems, and each stem into twelve branches.
The hieroglyphic denoting the stem being always different in the cycle, and that
of the branches being the same for each relative day, their astronomers had the
means of an exact chronology. They had a week of five days; every fifth day
being, like the Hindu system, market-day. Each day had a name, and each name a
hieroglyphic, representing that object.
35. Something of this kind was found, in the thought-work of the calendar of the
Aztecs of Mexico. They had however a cycle of fifty-two years, founded
manifestly in original ignorance of the true length of the year, and a wrong
division of the months. They had four days, called respectively, Tochtli, Acatl,
Techpatl, and Calli, or, a bird, a reed, a flint, and a house. The fifth day was
a market-day. These names they repeated to thirteen. Thirteen days constituted a
month, or trecena, as the Spaniards called it. A year consisted of twenty
months, or two hundred and sixty days. All this was clearly the result of a
superstitious astrology and wild mythology, in the hands of the priests and
political leaders, who were the exclusive repositories of knowledge, and were
leagued to acquire power over the people. It was early seen by them, by
observing the planetary motions, that their astronomy was wrong. To correct it,
and make it tally with the periods of the sun s recessions, they added one
hundred and five days to their year, making it, as we now see, correspond to the
lunar year of the East.
Each cycle was divided into four sub-periods of thirteen years, called Tlalpilli.
To record time, each day had a dot, or date, before its symbol, indicating its
number in the Tlalpilli, and a dot or date behind it, denoting the year of the
cycle. By this simple contrivance, although the names of the days were often
repeated, it was arithmetically impossible that the number of the Tlalpilli and
of the cycle should coincide. The arrangements are denoted on the following
table.
TLALPILLI
|
1. |
2. |
3. |
4. CYCLE 52 |
| 1 Tochtli |
1 |
1 Acatl |
14 |
1 Techpatl |
27 |
1 Calli |
40 |
| 2 Acatl |
2 |
2 Techpatl |
15 |
2 Calli |
28 |
2 Tochtli |
41 |
| 3 Techpatl |
3 |
3 Calli |
16 |
3 Tochtli |
29 |
3 Acatl |
42 |
| 4 Calli |
4 |
4 Tochtli |
17 |
4 Acatl |
30 |
4 Techpatl |
43 |
| 5 Tochtli |
5 |
5 Acatl |
18 |
5 Techpatl |
31 |
5 Calli |
44 |
| 6 Acatl |
6 |
6 Techpatl |
19 |
6 Calli |
32 |
6 Tochtli |
45 |
| 7 Techpatl |
7 |
7 Calli |
20 |
7 Tochtli |
33 |
7 Acatl |
46 |
| 8 Calli |
8 |
8 Tochtli |
21 |
8 Acatl |
34 |
8 Techpatl |
47 |
| 9 Tochtli |
9 |
9 Acatl |
22 |
9 Techpatl |
35 |
9 Calli |
48 |
| 10 Acati |
10 |
10 Techpatl |
23 |
10 Calli |
36 |
10 Tochtli |
49 |
| 11 Techpatl |
11 |
11 Calli |
24 |
11 Tochtli |
37 |
11 Acatl |
50 |
| 12 Calli |
12 |
12 Tochtli |
25 |
12 Acatl |
38 |
12 Techpatl |
51 |
| 13 Tochtli |
13 |
13 Acatl |
26 |
13 Techpatl |
39 |
13 Calli |
52 |
By this system, which is accurately observed in the map of Boturini, which we
have inserted in a condensed form, (Plates 1 and 2,) it was easy to determine
the time they employed in their migration down the Pacific coast, and into the
interior. But their year was still inexact, which was noticed by observations of
the priests; and in 1519, at the tune the Spaniards arrived, they had corrected
it to within two hours and thirty-nine minutes of the exact solar year. This was
their greatest triumph. It appears evident, however, that their system of
astronomy is of indigenous growth, and that, taking a few ideas of what had
affected the memories of their ancestors, in the eastern hemisphere, as the
market-day, and the double hieroglyphic system, it had been the accumulated
result of patient observation, in the clear skies of Mexico.
1a Gowan s Ancient Fragments, p. 135.
2a Prescott s Conquest of Mexico.
3a. See specimens among the pictographic writings in the sequel.
4a. Mackenzie.
5a. The Irqquois used an apparatus for giving velocity to a turning upright
stick, on a basis of wood, called Da-ya-yä-dä-ga-ne-at-hä. (See the Third Report
of the Regents of the New York University, on the State Collection of Natural
History, Antiquities, &c. Paper by Lewis H. Morgan, Esq., p. 88.)
6a. Herodotus.
7a. Oneota, p. 208.
8a. Abstract of the theology of Zoroaster.
9a. History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire.
10a. Iroquois Cosmogony, Part VI.
11a. Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge.
12a. Notes to Ontwa on Eternal Fire.
13a. Job.
14a. Oneöta.
15a. Lemprière.
16a. Part I. Indian Tales and Legends, 1839. Harpers, New York.
17a Rawlinson.
18a Voltaire's Essay on History.
19a Duhalde's China.
20a Rollin s Universal History.
21a H. H. Wilson s Two Lectures before the University of Oxford, on the Hindus.
London, 1841.
22a Antiquitatcs Americana.
23a. Un Pierre Grève, &c.
24a. Wilson.
25a. Zoroaster.
26a Harmon's Travels.
27a. Hackluyt's Collection.
28a. Grave-post.
29a.Wilson.
30a The great improvements in the microscope, which have been made within late
years, have had the tendency to show the permanency of the physical type of man,
by revealing the minute organization of animal tissue, bones, nails, flesh,
hair, pores of the skin, &c.
In a series of experiments devoted to the hair, made with this instrument, by
Mr. Peter A. Browne, of Philadelphia, this gentleman has demonstrated three
primary species of the hair and hairy tissue, or wool, of the human head, as
shown by the researches respecting the Anglo-Saxon, Indian, and Negro races.
These experiments, which appear to have been conducted with scientific and
philosophical care, denote the structure and organization of each of these
species to be peculiar. They are denominated, in the order above stated,
cylindrical or round, oval, and eccentrically elliptical, or flat. The Indian
hair employed in these experiments was the Choctaw. Inquiries are now on foot by
this gentleman, if we err not, in connection with the Philadelphia Academy of
Natural Sciences, to pursue these results.
Archives Of
Aboriginal Knowledge
Archives Of Aboriginal
Knowledge, Henry R. Schoolcraft, 1860
Free
Genealogy |
Indian
Genealogy |
Archives Of Aboriginal Knowledge
|
|