|
Preface of Personal
Names of Indians of New Jersey
This comparative table is given for what it is worth. It is perhaps more
curious than valuable.
Further examining the Indian names, we find that the letters b, f and r occur
but 21 times in the entire list; L 71 times, r 150 times.
Taking c as equivalent to L and C hard as equivalent to k; k and g and gi,
ki, ise, cis; e for i y and j (y); p for b and the normal letters are referenced
as follows;
| Indian Name |
Times |
In Names of Whites |
| M |
113 |
37 |
| W |
77 |
45 |
| P |
60 |
29 |
| S |
56 |
60 |
| T |
51 |
21 |
| N |
51 |
8 |
| A |
39 |
17 |
| C (hard k) |
34 |
34 |
| K |
29 |
10 |
| C (soft k) |
1 |
1-6 |
| CI |
4 |
5 |
| H |
20 |
52 |
| O |
20 |
6 |
| Q |
20 |
1-2 |
| E |
17 |
13 |
| R |
13 |
20 |
| L |
9 |
30 |
| I and J (Y) |
8 |
1-6 |
| I (short) |
1 |
3 |
| J |
3 |
14 |
| G |
5 |
23 |
| B |
3 |
40 |
| Y |
3 |
1 |
| F |
1 |
20 |
| V |
1 |
13 |
| D |
none |
23 |
| U |
none |
1-3 |
| Z |
none |
1 |
As f occurs but once, and v only four times, it is probable that they have
been incorrectly given, and they may be properly omitted. The sound indicated by
w would be as well shown by ou. Thus the initial letters would be reduced to 12.
The preponderance of m is perhaps due to the prefix m, indicating a general
designation, as opposed to one in particular; m, n and w suggest pronominal
prefixes. But most of the names are evidently descriptive.
As for the pronunciation: names appearing in deeds prior to 1664 were written by
the Dutch, except some on the Delaware river, which were written by Swedes.
After 1664 deeds for lands north of New ark were usually drawn up by Dutch
scriveners, and many in Mon-mouth and Somerset counties; but most of them were
written by Englishmen.
| M |
113 |
| K |
83 |
| W |
77 |
| P |
67 |
| S |
56 |
| T |
51 |
| N |
51 |
| A |
39 |
| E |
29 |
| H |
21 |
| O |
20 |
| R |
13 |
| L |
9 |
| F |
1 |
| V |
1 |
It is evident that many, if not most, of these scriveners had little or no
knowledge of the native language ; also, that they lacked the "Indian ear," as
Heckewelder calls it, and so were unable to apprehend the precise sounds of the
spoken words. In the same deed the Indian names are usually spelled differently
four or five times. Some of these variations have been given, that the reader
may be better able to judge approximately what was the actual or probable
pronunciation. As greater care is usually given to the signatures in an
instrument, so it doubtless was with these Indian deeds, that the scriveners
probably were more particular to have the names accurately written at the end.
Hence, in the following list, special men tion is frequently made of the forms
of the names as "signed." Of course, the Indians themselves merely made their
marks, often a tribal or gentile symbol, and the names attached to these marks
were written by the persons who drafted the deeds.
About 250 of the names herewith given are compiled from the New Jersey Archives,
Vol. XXI Calendar of Records in the Office of the Secretary of State, at
Trenton, 1665-1703. The figure following these names refers to the page of that
volume where they may be found. More than half of the list has been gleaned by
the writer from the records in the office referred to, having been omitted or
overlooked by the compiler of the Calendar mentioned. Others have been gathered
from all available printed sources, as well as from various original documents.
With very few exceptions no attempt has been made to interpret these names. This
list was compiled with no such object, but rather to place it within the reach
of expert students of the Algonquin language.
The origin and effect of Indian deeds for lands in New Jersey are explained in
my "Indians of New Jersey." It may be noted, however, that because an Indian
squaw or child joins in a deed it does not follow that the aborigines recognized
the woman s right of dower, or the child s right of inheritance in lands. The
simple fact was that the white purchaser acted on his own knowledge of the
English law, and wished to be sure of acquiring the whole of the Indian title.
For the same reason, probably, he was in the habit of getting all the Indians of
a neighborhood, as tenants in common, to join in the deed for an extensive tract
of land, or at least to have them sign as witnesses, so that on sober second
thought they might not claim that they had had no knowledge of the execution of
the deed.
Something like half of these names were published by the writer in the American
Anthropologist for January, 1902. The interest manifested in that publication
has led him to extend the list to its present proportions. It is believed that
no such list of aboriginal personal names, principally of the seventeenth
century, has ever been published before. That it may be helpful to the student
of American anthropology, and especially of the language of the Lenni-Lenape, is
the hope of the writer.
Additional Resources
Notes About the Book:
Source: The Indian Tribes of North America, by John R. Swanton, 1953, Bureau of
American Ethnology, Bulletin 145, US Government Printing Office, Washington DC.
Online Publication: The manuscript was scanned and then ocr'd. Minimal editing
has been done, and readers can and should expect some errors in the textual
output.
|
|