|
Letters,
Telegrams and Petitions 41-50
No. 41
Department of the Interior,
Office of Indian Affairs,
Washington, April 30, 1903
The Secretary of the Interior
Sir: Referring to Office report of April 28,
1903, relative to the Cherokee lands
segregated by the Commission to the Five
Civilized Tribes, in accordance with the
provisions of section 23 of the Cherokee
agreement, there is enclosed herewith a
report from the Commission, dated April 20,
1903, pertaining to the same subject.
In said report the Commission quotes section
23 of the agreement; quote from the
Commission's report of October 20, 1902, as
follows:
"The 157,600 acres of land to be segregated
for the Delaware are to include lands
Heretofore selected, occupied, and improved
by them, and upon which all of said Delaware
are having, as is set forth on page 10 of
their petition in the suit now pending in
the Court of Claims, as follows:
" 'That thereupon the said Delaware selected
the said 157,600 acres of land from the said
Cherokee Reservation east of hne 96, not
theretofore selected or in possession of
other parties, entered into the occupancy
and possession of the same and made
extensive and valuable improvements thereon,
and they, their children, descendants,
heirs-at-law, and personal representatives
have continued to occupy and possess the
said lands and the said improvements, and
have continued to make extensive and
valuable improvements thereon, and to reside
thereon down to the present time.' "
And from Department letter of November 29,
1902, in which the Commission was advised
that--
"The Department is in receipt of your
report, dated October 20, 1902, in regard to
a communication from Mr. Walter S. Logan,
concerning the suit of the Delaware Indians
against the Cherokee Nation, now pending in
the Court of Claims.
"The Department concurs in the views
expressed by your Commission, and has
advised Mr. Logan to that effect. The
Commissioner of Indian Affairs also
concurred."
It is then stated that on December 16, 1902,
there was filed with the Commission an
amended schedule of lands selected by the
Delaware in the Cherokee Nation: that this
schedule embodied the stipulation of counsel
for the Delaware and Cherokee, which,
omitting the title, is as follows:
"In pursuance of leave reserved and granted
by the court upon the final hearing of this
case, it is hereby stipulated and agreed
that the record herein be amended by
substituting in the place of the incorrect
descriptions given in the record herein of
the 157,600 acres selected and claimed by
the Delaware, the annexed descriptions,
which, upon careful examination, have been
found correct.
"And it is further stipulated and agreed
that the court may in its decision and final
judgment herein, use the annexed correct
descriptions in the place of the incorrect
descriptions contained in said record:
Provided, however, Such substituted
descriptions do not interfere with the
lawful rights or claims of other Cherokee
citizens.
WALTER S. LOGAN, Attorney for Petitioners
WILHAM T. HITCHINS, Attorney for Respondent.
Washington, D. C, December 10, 190e
The report shows that on December 17, 1902,
the Commission adopted the following
resolution:
''Be it resolved by the Commission, That the
acting chairman cause to be set aside and
segregated 157,600 acres of land in the
Cherokee Nation, in accordance with the
provisions of section 23 of the act of
Congress approved July 1, 1902 (Public No.
241), subject to disposition according to
such judgment as may be rendered in the case
of the Delaware Indians v. the Cherokee
Nation, now pending in the United States
Court of Claims and as shown by the
description of said land in the stipulation
of counsel for parties in said case, dated
at Washington, D. C, December 10, 1902."
The Commission states that in proceeding to
carry the resolution into effect, numerous
errors and discrepancies were discovered in
the schedule; that on January 5, 1903, the
attention of Walter S. Logan and Wilham T.
Hutchings, counsel for the petitioners and
respondent, respectively, was called to said
errors and discrepancies. A copy of the
Commission's communication of the date last
mentioned is among the papers and is marked
"Exhibit A."
The report shows that on January 23, 1903,
Mr. Richard C. Adams, who claims to
represent the Delaware Indians, furnished
the Commission with a copy of a "second
amended schedule of lands selected by the
Delaware in the Cherokee Nation, as per
stipulation of counsel," which contains an
additional stipulation by counsel, as
follows:
"We agree to the corrections herein in ink
on pages 2, 4, 9, 12, 14, 42, 46, 51, 54,
63, 72, 73, and 74, being two corrections on
pages 9, 42, 46, 63, and one on each of the
other pages, subject to the above proviso."
The Commission states that the "above
proviso" in the additional stipulation
refers to the following: "Provided, however,
such substituted descriptions do not
interfere with the lawful rights or claims
of other Cherokee citizens" contained in the
first stipulation. A copy of Mr. Adams's
letter of January 15, 1903, transmitting the
second amended schedule, is among the papers
and is marked "Exhibit B."
The Commission states that a comparison of
the errors and discrepancies reported to the
counsel for the Delaware and Cherokees,
respectively, by the Commission, with the
corrections made in the second amended
schedule, shows that the discrepancies which
counsel failed to correct pertain to lands
reported by the Indian inspector for the
Indian Territory, to have been reserved by
the Department for town site purposes; that
the Commission advised the attorneys for the
contending parties that the schedule of
Delaware lands "embraced 12.34 acres within
the limits of the town site of Bartlesville,
12.50 acres within the limits of the town
site of Lenepah, and 17.88 acres within the
limits of the town site of Salhsaw," and
that Mr. Adams, in his letter of January 15
last, states that--
"On page 14 we take exception to the town of
Bartlesville intruding on Delaware lands. On
page 54, which you claim that part of the
selection belongs to the town of Lenapah, we
do not concede this for the same reason as
above-- that is, we had made the selections
before the town was surveyed; and on pages
73 and 74 we contend that our rights to this
land are older and better than the rights of
the town of Salhsaw."
It is then stated that since the opening of
the Cherokee allotment office at Vinita, on
January1 last, a number of Cherokee citizens
have made applications for allotments of
lands embraced wholly or in part in the
segregation made for the Delaware; that such
citizens in many instances claim to have
been in possession of the lands applied for
for years, and to own valuable improvements
on the same, and that no Delaware citizen
has ever occupied such lands or owned any
improvements thereon; that action on this
class of applications has been deferred,
pending the determination of the
Delaware-Cherokee suit, and attention is
invited to Mr. Adams's communication of
April 7, 1903, a copy of which is among the
papers, and marked "Exhibit C wherein he
states--
"My understanding is that the 157,600 acres
of land is segregated, and that no Cherokee
will be allowed to file on this land or to
receive allotment out of it until the
Supreme Court has finally passed upon the
rights of the Delaware Indians."
A copy of a letter from Mr. Adams to the
same effect, dated April 10, 1903, is among
the papers, and marked " Exhibit D."
The Commission states that from Mr. Adams's
communication it "appears that,
notwithstanding the proviso in the
stipulation of counsel that the substituted
descriptions are not to interfere with the
lawful rights or claims of other Cherokee
citizens, the Delaware, through Mr. Adams,
take the position that if the decision of
the Supreme Court is favorable to them the
specific 157,600 acres described in the
record of the case will vest absolutely in
the Delaware, notwithstanding any claims
which other Cherokee citizens may make to
portions of the same lands;" that in
addition to the contention of the Delaware
for the lands embraced within the limits of
the town sites mentioned, and for lands
claimed "and in the possession of other
Cherokee citizens," a serious situation with
reference to the Delaware segregation has
developed in the work of allotment; that not
a few Delaware citizens have presented
themselves at the land office and asked to
be allowed to make final selection of lands
containing their improvements and upon which
they reside, claiming that no portion of the
lands occupied by them is included in the
segregation; that the Commission has been
informally advised "of cases of numerous
other Delaware citizens whose improved lands
are not included within said segregation,
and the statement has been frequently made
that the representatives of the Delaware
Indians, or their business committee,
refused to schedule for segregation the
lands of any Delaware citizen who failed to
pay a pro rata share of the fee which said
representatives or committee demanded;" that
the extent of the condition of affairs last
mentioned is indicated by the correspondence
had with Mr. Wilham Nairn, copies of which
are among the papers marked "Exhibit E;"
that it is evident that while lands occupied
by Delaware citizens have not been included
in the schedule of lands made a part of the
record in the suit commenced by the
Delaware, "an amount of the public domain of
the Cherokee Nation sufficient to bring the
total segregation up to 157,600 acres has
been included," and the Commission forwarded
copies of the correspondence of the clerk in
charge of the Cherokee land office at
Vinita, which copies are marked "Exhibits F
and G," and show that since the segregation
of the lands for the Delaware "by this
Commission on December 17, 1902," the
Department has fixed the exterior limits of
the town sites of North Tulsa and Lawton, in
the Cherokee Nation, which embrace 20 and 25
acres, respectively, of the amount
theretofore included in the Delaware
segregation; that under the circumstances
the Commission believes that the land
embraced in the original schedule, and in
the first and. second amended schedules,
made a part of the record in the Delaware
case, have not been selected with due regard
for the interests of either the Delaware
citizens generally or other citizens of the
Cherokee Nation, and without any intention
of conforming to the laws pertaining to the
establishment of town sites.
The Commission enclosed with its report a
copy of a communication addressed to Hon. M.
S. Quay, United States Senator from
Pennsylvania, by Mr. Adams, on April 10,
1903, which was referred to the Commission
by Senator Quay. Said copy is marked
"Exhibit H." Mr. Adams's communication of
April 10, 1903, to Senator Quay is almost
identical with his letter of April 18, 1903,
which was forwarded to the Department with
office report of April 28, 1903. In this
communication he takes the position that the
Commission is without jurisdiction to
receive applications of Cherokee citizens
for lands embraced within the Delaware
segregation, and the Commission states that
this position is taken "notwithstanding the
proviso of counsel in the stipulation
hereinbefore set forth providing for the
protection of the property rights of other
Cherokee citizens."
The Commission believes that steps should be
taken by the Department to guard against the
possibility of the Supreme Court, in
rendering judgment in said case, adopting
the schedule "as the definite and specific
tracts of land to which the Delaware are
entitled under their claim," and requests
that the Department issue such instructions
as may be deemed proper in the premises.
From the papers before this office it
appears that the Commission has segregated
lands for the Delaware, if any segregation
has been made, in accordance with schedules
furnished it by Mr. Adams.
December 17, 1902, the Commission adopted a
resolution authorizing and empowering the
then acting chairman to segregate the
Delaware lands as required by the Cherokee
agreement.
The Commission stated in its report of March
17, 1903, relative to the Commission's work
during the month of February, that the lands
had been segregated, and it appears that the
Commission considers that the lands were
segregated as of date December 17, 1902, the
day the resolution was adopted, although the
Commission's report shows that it accepted
the second-amended schedule from Mr. Adams
on January 23, 1903. There is nothing in the
papers which shows that the Commission or
the present chairman of the Commission, in
accordance with the resolution of December
17 last segregated the lands referred to,
except the Commission's communication of
January 5, 1903, addressed to Walter S.
Logan and Wilham T. Hutchings, a copy of
which is among the papers. In that
communication it is stated that "the
Commission has segregated and reserved from
allotment, subject to disposition according
to such judgment as maybe rendered in said
cause, 157,541.74 acres of land in the
Cherokee Nation, the same being the land
described in said stipulation, less 60
acres" accounted for as indicated in the
Commission's communication.
The Commission's report and other papers do
not show that the chairman of the Commission
actually segregated the land in accordance
with said resolution, and that his action
was approved by the Commission. It seems
that the Commission did not investigate the
matter and ascertain whether the lands it
segregated or proposed to segregate were
"lands which have been selected and occupied
by Delaware in conformity to the provisions
of their agreement with the Cherokees" of
April 8, 1867, but that it simply took the
schedule or schedules furnished it by Mr.
Adams, and that the segregation was made, if
any has been made, in accordance with such
schedule or schedules, without investigation
as to whether the lands described therein
were susceptible of segregation in
accordance with the provisions of law. It
seems to this Office that the Commission
should have first segregated all lands
"which have been selected and occupied by
Delaware," and if the total amount
segregated did not aggregate the required
amount, then segregate from the public
domain lands sufficient to make 157,600
acres.
If the Delaware Indians had "selected and
occupied" more than 157,600 acres the
aggregate amount of the lands selected and
occupied by them should have been reduced,
so that the total would not exceed 157,600
acres. This segregation, the Office
believes, should have been made by the
Commission from its own records and proper
investigation, and not from the schedule or
schedules furnished it by Mr. Adams or
anyone else representing the Delaware. The
schedule or schedules furnished by Mr. Adams
could have been used by the Commission in
connection with the making of the
segregation, but the Commission should not
have simply segregated the lands which he
requested be segregated without proper
investigation.
From the Commission's report it appears that
the Commission segregated the lands that Mr.
Adams requested be segregated, and it seems,
and, in fact, the Commission states, that
the lands purported to have been segregated
do not include all of the lands "selected
and occupied by Delaware."
The records of this office do not show that
the Department has been furnished with the
legal description of the lands alleged to
have been segregated by the Commission. It
seems to the office that the Commission
should, as soon as the lands were
segregated, have furnished the Department
with a list of the segregated lands.
With reference to the town sites the records
of this office show that the establishment
of the exterior limits of Bartlesville was
approved March 13, 1902; that the
establishment of the exterior limits of
Lenepah was approved March 5, 1902; and that
the establishment of the exterior limits of
Salhsaw was approved May 15, 1902.
At the time that the establishment of the
exterior limits of the towns above mentioned
was approved by the Department the Delaware
lands had not been segregated, and the
office believes that, under the provisions
of the Cherokee agreement, lands not
specifically segregated for any particular
purpose were susceptible of being set aside
for town-site purposes. It therefore
believes that Mr. Adams's contention
relative to the Department's not having
authority to segregate the lands referred to
by him, for town-site purposes, is
untenable.
August 15, 1902, the Department authorized
the Inspector for the Indian Territory to
properly establish the exterior limits of
the town of Lawton. This was prior to the
purported segregation of Delaware lands on
December 17 last, and the remarks relative
to Bartlesville and the other towns above
mentioned are applicable to Lawton.
The establishment of the exterior limits of
North Tulsa was approved by the Department
January 21, 1903, which was subsequent to
the alleged segregation of Delaware lands.
If the Delaware lands have been segregated,
as the Commission holds, it is doubtful
whether any of the lands should have been
included within the limits of the town, as
it seems that it was the intention of
Congress that the segregated lands be not in
any way disturbed after segregation until
the Delaware-Cherokee suit shall have been
finally determined. The Commission seems to
be of the opinion that on account of the
stipulation signed by the attorneys for the
parties to the litigation, which is, in
part, as follows:
Provided, however, Such substituted
descriptions do not interfere with the
lawful rights or claims of other Cherokee
citizens," its jurisdiction to allot to
Cherokees, or at least to receive and tile
application for allotment, covers segregated
lands.
The Commission's report of March 17, 1903,
relative to the work performed by it during
the month of February, 1903, shows that 38
applications for allotments were not
approved "because the land applied for was
embraced in the 157, 600 acres of land which
the Commission caused to be segregated for
the Delaware Indians," and its report of
April 10, 1908, relative to the work
performed by it during the month of March,
1903, which has this day been transmitted,
shows that 57 applications for allotments
have not been approved for the same reason.
This Office does not understand that the
Commission has any jurisdiction of the
segregated lands alter the segregation shall
have been made until such time as the court
shall have finally decided the case. The law
specifically declares that the lands shall
be segregated, and that when segregated
"such lands so to remain" until the final
determination of the cause, and requires the
Commission to allot "the remaining lands of
the tribe as aforesaid."
The fact that the attorneys for the
contending parties have signed a stipulation
agreeing that the lands segregated shall not
"interfere with the lawful rights or claims
of other Cherokee citizens" does not in any
manner whatsoever nullify or modify the law.
The law is directory, and the Commission has
no discretionary power in the premises. If
the 157,600 acres have been segregated, the
Office does not believe that the Commission
should, until after the determination of the
suit, permit any citizen of the nation to
even file an application selecting any of
the segregated lands as his allotment.
If an error has been made by the Commission
in segregating lands lawfully in the
possession of Cherokee citizens not of
Delaware blood, the error should be
corrected, and after this has been done,
Cherokee citizens, whether of Delaware blood
or other-wise, should not be permitted to
file an application covering any of the
segregated lands pending the determination
of the case. It is thought that during said
time the Commission should not even receive
and file applications covering segregated
lands. Applicants should, the Office
believes, be advised that the Commission is
without jurisdiction to allot or to receive
an application covering any of such lands
during the pendency of the suit.
The Commission's reports for the months of
February and March show that it has received
95 applications covering lands alleged to
have been segregated in accordance with
section 23 of the agreement. To continue
such applications will only be the means of
complicating matters and fostering contests.
The Commission seems to be of the opinion
that the Supreme Court of the United States
may, in deciding the Delaware suit, approve
a certain schedule, which seems to be a part
of the record in the case, and expresses the
opinion that steps should be taken to
prevent such action by the court. The Office
does not understand that the court has
authority to approve such schedule. The
province of the court seems to be to decide
the questions involved and to determine what
interests the Delaware citizens have in the
Cherokee lands, and it is the duty of the
Commission, and not of the court, to
segregate the 157,600 acres. However, it is
believed that the Commission should furnish
the Department with legal descriptions of
the tracts segregated, if such segregation
has been made, for its information and for
such action, with reference to bringing the
matter to the attention of the court, as the
Department may consider proper.
If the Department shall hold that the
Commission has segregated the 157,600 acres
of land it is suggested that the Commission
be advised in accordance herewith; but if
the Department shall hold that the land has
not been segregated it is thought that the
Commission should be instructed to
immediately segregate from allotment, "so to
remain" until the final determination of the
cause, 157,600 acres of land, the same to
include "lands which have been selected and
occupied by Delaware in conformity with the
agreement of April 8, 1867."
As above stated, the Office believes that
the Department had full power and authority
to segregate any Cherokee lands for town
site purposes, regardless of whether
occupied by Delaware citizens or any other
citizen of the Cherokee Nation prior to the
alleged Delaware segregation of December 17
last; and as part of the Delaware
segregation is included within the limits of
town sites, it is thought that the
Commission should be instructed to segregate
from the Public domain or lands in
possession of Delaware citizens, if all of
such lauds have not been segregated,
additional lands in an amount equal to the
Delaware segregation included within the
limits in the town sites above mentioned,
except North Tulsa.
If the Delaware lands were segregated on
December 17, 1902, and were not after that
date susceptible of allotment during the
pendency of the suit, or subject to being
reserved for town site purposes after the
segregation, it would seem that the
Department's action in setting aside 20
acres of the Delaware segregation for town
site purposes in the town of North Tulsa
should be reconsidered, and that the 20
acres mentioned should not be included
within the limits of the town site.
The records of this Office and the
Commission's report do not show that the
inspector for the Indian Territory had been
advised of the alleged segregation of
Delaware lands. If he had been so advised,
it is not probable that he would have
recommended that 20 acres of such lands be
included within the limits of the town of
North Tulsa, at least without bringing the
matter to the attention of the Department.
Very respectfully,
A. C. TONNER, Acting Commissioner
No. 42
Muscogee, Ind. T., April 20, 1903.
The Secretary of the Interior
Sir: Report is hereby respectfully made of
the action of the Commission in segregating
157,600 acres of land under section 23 of
the act of July 1, 1902 (32 Stat. L., 716),
pending the determination of the suit of the
Delaware Indians v The Cherokee Nation and
submitting matters relating thereto for the
consideration of the Department.
Said section 23 is as follows:
"All Delaware Indians who are members of the
Cherokee Nation shall take lands and share
in the funds of the tribe, as their rights
may be determined by the judgment of the
Court of Claims, or by the Supreme Court if
appealed, in the suit instituted therein by
the Delaware against the Cherokee Nation and
now pending; but if said suit be not
determined before said Commission is ready
to begin the allotment of lands of the tribe
as herein provided, the Commission shall
cause to be segregated one hundred and
fifty-seven thousand six hundred acres of
land, including lands which have been
selected and occupied by Delaware in
conformity to the provisions of their
agreement with the Cherokees dated April
eighth, eighteen hundred and sixty-seven,
such lands to remain subject to disposition
according to such judgment as may be
rendered in said cause: and said Commission
shall thereupon proceed to the allotment of
the remaining lands of the tribe as
aforesaid. Said Commission shall, when final
judgment is rendered, allot lands to such
Delaware in conformity to the terms of the
judgment and their individual rights
thereunder. Nothing in this act shall in any
manner impair the rights of either party to
said contract as the same may be finally
determined by the court, or shall interfere
with the holdings of the Delaware under
their contract with the Cherokees of April
eighth, eighteen hundred and sixty-seven,
until their rights under said contract are
determined by the courts in their suit now
pending against the Cherokees, and said suit
shall be advanced on the dockets of said
courts and determined at the earliest time
practicable."
In its communication of October 20, 1902,
reporting on a letter from Mr. Walter S.
Logan, referred to it by the Department, the
Commission among other things stated:
"The 157,600 acres of land to be segregated
for the Delaware are to include lands
heretofore selected, occupied, and improved
by them and upon which all of said Delaware
are having, as is set forth on page 10 of
their petition in the suit now pending in
the Court of Claims, as follows:
" 'That thereupon the said Delaware selected
the said 157,600 acres of land from the said
Cherokee Reservation east of hne 96°, not
theretofore selected or in possession of
other parties, entered into the occupancy
and possession of the land and made
extensive and valuable improvements thereon,
and they, their children, descendants,
heir's at law, and personal representatives
have continued to occupy and possess the
said lands and the said improvements and
have continued to make extensive and
valuable improvements thereon and to reside
then>on down to the present time.' "
Under date of November 29, 1902, the
Department advised the Commission as
follows:
"The Department is in receipt of your report
dated October 20, 1902, in regard to a
communication from Mr. Walter S. Logan,
concerning the suit of the Delaware Indians
against the Cherokee Nation, now pending in
the Court of Claims. The Department concurs
in the views expressed by your Commission,
and has advised Mr. Logan to that effect.
The Commissioner of Indian Affairs also
concurred."
On December 16, 1902, there was filed with
the Commission, an amended schedule of lands
selected by the Delaware in the Cherokee
Nation, said schedule being embodied in the
stipulation of counsel, the preamble of
which, after omitting the title, is as
follows:
"In pursuance of leave reserved and granted
by the court upon the final hearing of this
case, it is hereby stipulated and agreed
that the record herein be amended by
substituting in the place of the incorrect
descriptions given in the record herein of
the loT, (UK) acres selected and claimed by
the Delaware, the annexed descriptions
whit'h, upon careful examination, have been
found correct.
"And it is further stipulated and agreed
that the court may, in its decision and
final judgment herein, use the annexed
correct descriptions in the place of the
incorrect descriptions contained in said
record: Provided, however, Such substituted
descriptions do not interfere with the
lawful rights or claims of other Cherokee
citizens.
Walter S. Logan,
Attorney for Petitioners
William T. Hitchings,
Attorney for Respondent
Washington, D. C, December l0, 1902
On December 17, 1902, the Commission adopted
the following resolution:
"Be it resolved, by the Commission, That the
acting chairman cause to be set aside and
segregated 157,600 acres of land in the
Cherokee Nation, in accordance with the
provisions of section 23 of the act of
Congress approved July 1, 1902 (Public No.
241), subject to disposition according to
such judgment as may be rendered in the case
of The Delaware Indians v. The Cherokee
Nation now pending in the United States
Court of Claims and as shown by the
description of said land in the stipulation
of counsel for parties in said case, dated
at Washington, D. C, December 10, 1902."
In proceeding to carry said resolution into
effect the Commission discovered numerous
errors and discrepancies from the schedules
submitted, which by letter dated January 5,
1903, were called to the attention of Walter
S. Logan and Wilham T. Hutchings, counsel
for petitioners and respondent,
respectively, a copy of said letter being
attached hereto and marked "Exhibit A."
On January 23, 1903, the Commission received
from Richard C. Adams, claiming to represent
the Delaware Indians at Washington, a
certified copy of a "second amended schedule
of lands selected by the Delaware in the
Cherokee Nation as per stipulation of
counsel," which contains the additional
stipulation by counsel, as follows:
"We agree to the corrections herein in ink
on pages 2, 4, 9, 12, 14, 42, 46, 51, 54,
63, 72, 73, 74, being two corrections on
pages 9, 42, 46, 63, and one on each of the
other pages, subject to the above proviso,"
The "above proviso" referred to in the
additional stipulation just quoted refers to
the following in the first stipulation
quoted, viz: ''Provided, however, such
substituted descriptions do not interfere
with the lawful rights or claims of other
Cherokee citizens."
A copy of Mr. Adams's letter of January 15,
1903, transmitting said omitted schedule, is
herewith attached, marked "Exhibit B."
A comparison of the errors and discrepancies
reported to counsel by the Commission with
the corrections made in the second amended
schedule, shows that the discrepancies which
counsel failed to correct have reference to
land, reported by the Indian inspector for
Indian Territory to have been reserved by
the Department for town site purposes.
The Commission had reported to counsel that
the schedule of Delaware lands embraced
12.34 acres within the limits of the town
site of Bartlesville, 12.50 acres within the
limits of the town site of Lenepah and 17.88
acres within the limits of the town site of
Salhsaw. Referring to said report, Mr.
Adams, in his letter, states:
"On page 14 we take exception to the town of
Bartlesville intruding on Delaware lands. On
page 54, which you claim that part of the
selection belongs to the town of Lenepah, we
do not concede this for the same reason as
above, that is, we have made the selections
before the town was surveyed, and on pages
73 and 74 we contend that our rights to this
land are older and better than the rights of
the town of Salhsaw."
Since the opening of the Cherokee allotment
office at Vinita, Ind. T., on January 1,
1903, a number of Cherokee citizens have
made application for allotments of land
embraced wholly or in part in the
segregation made for the Delaware. They
claim in many instances to have been in
possession of these lands for years and to
own valuable improvements on the same, and
state that no Delaware citizen has ever
occupied such lands or owned any
improvements thereon. Action on this class
of applications has been deferred pending
the determination of the suit referred to.
In a communication dated April 7, 1903, a
copy of which is hereto attached and marked
"Exhibit C,'' Mr. Adams states:
"My understanding is that the 157,600 acres
of land is segregated, and that no Cherokee
will be allowed to file on this land or to
receive allotment out of it until the
Supreme Court has finally passed upon the
rights of the Delaware Indians."
A copy of a letter to the same effect from
Mr. Adams, dated April 10, 1903, is hereto
attached and marked "Exhibit D."
From these it appears that, notwithstanding
the proviso in the stipulation of counsel
that the substituted descriptions are not to
interfere with the lawful rights or claims
of other Cherokee citizens, the Delaware,
through Mr. Adams, take the position that if
the decision if the Supreme Court is
favorable to them the specific 157,600 acres
described in the record of the case will
vest absolutely in the Delaware,
notwithstanding any claims which other
Cherokee citizens may make to portions of
the same lands.
In addition to the contention of the
Delaware for the lands embraced within the
limits of the town sites mentioned, and for
lands claimed and in the possession of other
Cherokee citizens, quite a serious situation
with reference to the Delaware segregation
has developed in the work of allotment. Not
a few Delaware citizens have presented
themselves at the land office and asked to
he allowed to make a final selection of
lands containing their improvements and upon
which they reside, claiming that no portion
of the lands occupied by them is included
within said Delaware segregation.
The Commission has been informally advised
of cases of numerous other Delaware citizens
whose improved lands are not included within
said segregation, and the statement has been
frequently made that the representatives of
the Delaware Indians or their business
committee refused to schedule for
segregation the lands of any Delaware
citizen who failed to pay a pro rata share
of the fee which said representatives or
committee demanded. The Delaware, whose
property rights are thus unprotected, are
for the most part in moderate circumstances,
and the improvements on the lands occupied
by them represent, in most instances, the
efforts of a lifetime.
The extent of the condition of affairs last
mentioned is indicated by the correspondence
had with Wilham Nairn, of Coodys Bluff, Ind.
T., copies of which are hereto attached and
marked "Exhibit E."
It is quite evident that while lands
occupied by Delaware citizens have not been
included in the schedule of lands made a
part of the record in the suit of the
Delaware an amount of the public domain of
the Cherokee Nation sufficient to bring the
total segregation up to 157,600 acres has
been included.
There are also attached hereto and marked
"Exhibit F" and "Exhibit G," copies of
reports of the clerk in charge of the
Cherokee land office in Vinita, dated
February 12, 1903, showing that since the
segregation of lands for Delaware by this
Commission on December 17, 1902, the
Department has fixed the exterior limits of
the town sites of North Tulsa and Lawton in
the Cherokee Nation, which embrace,
respectively, 20 and 25 acres of land
theretofore included in said Delaware
segregation.
Under all circumstances the Commission
believes that the lands embraced in the
original schedule, and in the first and
second amended schedules made a part of the
record in the case of the Delaware, have not
been selected with a due regard for the
interests of either the Delaware citizens
generally or other citizens of the Cherokee
Nation, and in so far as town sites are
affected without any intention of conforming
to the laws relating to the establishment of
such town sites.
The Commission is in receipt of a
communication from Mr. Adams to Hon. M. S.
Quay, United States Senator from
Pennsylvania, dated April 10, 1903, and
referred by Senator Quay to the Commission.
A copy of said letter and of Senator Quay's
indorsement thereon is hereto attached,
marked "Exhibit H." In this latest letter Mr
Adams takes the position that the Commission
is without jurisdiction to receive
applications of Cherokee citizens for lands
embraced in the Delaware segregation,
notwithstanding the proviso of counsel in
the stipulation hereinbefore set forth
providing for the protection of the property
rights of other Cherokee citizens.
The Commission believes that some steps
should be taken to guard against the
possibility of the Supreme Court rendering a
judgment adopting said schedule as the
definite and specific tracts of land to
which the Delaware are entitled under their
claim, and respectfully request that the
Department may issue such instructions as it
may deem proper in the premises.
Respectfully,
TAMS BIXBY, Chairman
T. B. NEEDLES,
C. R. BRECKENRIDGE
W. E. STANLEY,
(Through the Commissioner of Indian
Affairs.)
No. 43
May 4, 1903.
The Assistant Attorney-General for the
Department of the Interior.
Sir: There is transmitted herewith a report
of the Acting Commissioner of Indian Affairs
of April 30, 1903, submitting a
communication from the Commission to the
Five Civilized Tribes (with enclosures),
relative to lands segregated by it under
section 23 of the act of July 1, 1902 (32
Stat. L., 716, copy enclosed); also a letter
from him of April 28, 1903, with enclosures,
reporting in regard to a communication from
Richard C. Adams, relative to such
segregation.
The Commission states on page 7 of its
letter that--
"Under all circumstances the Commission
believes that the lands embraced in the
original schedule and in the first and
second amended schedules made a part of the
record in the case of the Delaware have not
been select was with a due regard for the
interests of either the Delaware citizens
generally, or other citizens of the Cherokee
Nation, and in so far as town sites are
affected, without any intention of
conforming to the laws relating to the
establishment of such town sites."
The Department requests your opinion as to
whether said segregation has been made in
conformity to the law, and what its
authority and duty are in the premises.
Respectfully,
THOS. RYAN, Acting Secretary
No. 44
Department of the Interior,
Washington, June 1, 1903
The Assistant Attorney-General for the
Interior Department.
Sir: There is enclosed herewith for
consideration in connection with
departmental letter of May 4, 1903,
transmitting certain correspondence relative
to lands segregated by the Commission to the
Five Civilized Tribes for the benefit of the
Delaware, a communication dated May 27,
1903, from Mr. Richard C. Adams, Washington,
D. C., relative to the matter.
Respectfully,
THOS. RYAN, Acting Secretary
No. 45
May 27, 1903.
The Secretary of the Interior, Washington,
D. C.
Sir: Confirming my letter of April 18, 1903,
relative to the rights of the Delaware in
the lands segregated for their benefit under
section 23 of the act of Congress approved
July 1, 1902, I wish to state that I have
recently visited the Delaware and find that
conditions are growing much worse instead of
better, and the Delaware desire an early
decision in regard to their rights and the
right of the Commission to the Five
Civilized Tribes to allow Cherokee citizens
to file upon the segregated lands.
I find that in many cases Cherokees have
gone to the Commission to the Five Civilized
Tribes and filed on lands owned, occupied
by, and in possession of Delaware Indians,
and recognized as lands segregated for them;
that such Cherokees immediately upon filing
on the land take possession of it, and, in
some cases, fence such land, even though it
be a part of the land cultivated by a
Delaware. The Delaware Indian is warned by
the Cherokee against trespassing on his own
land and even threatened with injunction,
which threat in one or two cases has been
made good.
The Delaware Indians are much alarmed over
the manner in which their rights are
neglected. They feel they have a right to
the protection of the Secretary of the
Interior, and that the law guarantees to
them this protection; that it is unnecessary
for them to be put to the expense and
trouble of appealing to the courts for
protection, and that the Secretary should
not only put a stop to the Cherokees filing
on said lands but should remove all persons
from the segregated lands who do not hold as
Delaware Indians or under authority of said
Indians.
Very respectfully,
RICHARD C. ADAMS
No. 46
[Telegram.]
Vinita, Ind. T., January 2, 1903.
T. M. Buffington,
Care National Hotel, Washington, D. C:
Commission is issuing numbers to persons on
doubtful cards to take allotments Monday.
Enter protest and call Secretary's attention
to sections 11, 29, and 31 of Cherokee
agreement. Letter follows. Answer.
W. W. HASTINGS, Attorney.
No. 47
[Telegram.]
Washington, January 3, 1903.
Dawes Commission, Muscogee, Ind. T.
Protest filed by Cherokee Nation against
your alleged action in issuing numbers to
Persons on doubtful cards to take allotments
on Monday. Report fully by wire.
THOS. RYAN, Acting Secretary
No. 48
[Telegram.]
Muscogee, Ind. T., January 3, 1903.
Secretary of Interior, Washington, D. C:
Telegram received. Commission has thought
advisable to make reservations for doubtful
Cherokee claimants, pending determination of
cases, where such claimants are in
possession and own improvements. No
allotments will be made to them before cases
are finally acted upon by Department.
BIXBY. Acting Chairman
No. 49
[Telegram.]
Washington, January 5, 1903.
Bixby, Acting Chairman, Muscogee, Ind. T.:
Since your report January 3 shows that
reservations are made for doubtful Cherokee
claimants, pending determination of their
cases, only where such claimants are in
possession and own improvements, your action
in that respect is approved.
THOS. RYAN, Acting Secretary
No. 50
Department ok the Interior,
Office of Indian Affairs,
Washington, November 18, 1903.
The Secretary of the Interior
Sir: Referring to Department letters of
October 6 and 29, 1903, respectively,
relative to the segregation of the lands
claimed by the Delaware Indians, there is
enclosed herewith a report from the
Commission to the Five Civilized Tribes,
dated November 11, 1903, transmitting what
appears to be a "second amended schedule of
lands selected by the Delaware in the
Cherokee Nation as per stipulation of
counsel." The Commission quotes section 25
of the act of June 28, 1898, and section 23
of the Cherokee agreement, both of which are
familiar to the Department, and states that
under section 25 of the Curtis Act suit was
brought by the Delaware Indians against the
Cherokee Nation in the Court of Claims for
the purpose of adjudicating the rights of
the Delaware Indians to share in the
allotment of lands and in the distribution
of the funds of the Cherokee Nation; that on
February 2, 1903, the Court of Claims
dismissed said suit; that an appeal was
taken from the decision of this court to the
Supreme Court of the United States, where
the case is now pending on appeal; that on
December 16, 1902, there was filed with the
Commission an amended schedule of lands
purporting to comprise the 157,600 acres
scheduled and claimed by Delaware Indians in
the Cherokee Nation under the
Delaware-Cherokee agreement of April 8,
1867; that annexed to said schedule was a
stipulation between the attorneys for the
contending parties to the effect that the
schedule embraced the 157,600 acres of land
claimed by the Delaware, and that upon
careful examination the descriptions in the
schedule had been found to be correct.
It is said that the Commission, relying on
said stipulation and believing the schedule
to be satisfactory to all the parties in
interest, on December 17, 1902, adopted the
following resolution:
"Be it resolved by the Commission, That the
acting chairman cause to be set aside and
segregated 157,600 acres of land in the
Cherokee Nation, in accordance with the
provisions of section 23 of the act of
Congress approved July, 1902 (Public, No.
241), subject to disposition according to
such judgment as may be rendered in the case
of the Delaware Indians v. The Cherokee
Nation, now pending in the United States
Court of Claims, and as shown by the
description of said land in the stipulation
of counsel for parties in said case, dated
at Washington, D. C, December 10, 1902."
And that, in compliance with this
resolution, "the said segregation of
Delaware lands was accordingly made,
December 17, 1902, and entered upon the maps
and plats of the Commission;" that
subsequently numerous errors and
discrepancies were found in the schedules,
to which the attention of counsel for both
parties was directed by the Commission's
letter of January 5 last; that "a second
amended schedule" was tiled with the
Commission January 23, 1903, which is simply
the former schedule with certain alterations
and corrections, and contains the agreement
herein previously mentioned between the
attorneys, with an additional stipulation as
follows:
"We agree to the corrections herein in ink
on pages 2, 4, 9, 12, 14, 42, 51, 54, 63,
72, 73, 74, being two corrections on pages
9, 42, 46, 63, and one on each of the other
pages, subject to the above proviso.
WALTER S. LOGAN, Attorney for petitioner
WM. T. HUTCHINGS, Attorney for respondent
By J. J. HEMPHILL
January 13, 1903
The Commission says that upon the filing of
the second amended schedule the lands
described therein were, on January 23, 1903,
accepted and adopted by it as the
segregation of Delaware lands which the
Commission is directed by law to make: that
since the making and adoption of the latter
segregation it has been found that counsel
failed to correct all the errors and
discrepancies to which their attention was
invited; that such errors consist largely of
improperly including in said schedule
certain lands which are embraced within the
limits of certain town sites reserved under
section 24 of the Cherokee agreement; that
it has also been found since the adoption of
said segregation that there are lands
outside of the segregation, but within the
limits of the Cherokee Nation, which are not
occupied by Delaware who own the
improvements located thereon, and that there
are lands within the segregation which are
occupied by Cherokees who own the
improvements thereon. The Commission says
"it is believed that an amendment ought to
be made to said segregation, at the proper
time, embodying all the corrections which
shall be found necessary," and concludes its
report as follows:
"Inasmuch as it has been held by the supreme
court of the District of Columbia n the case
of Bullette v. Hitchcock et al. that the
approval of the Secretary of the Interior is
necessary to the validity of any such
segregation which the commission may make,
it is respectfully recommended that the
action of the Commission relative to the
adoption of said segregation be approved by
the Department, and that at the proper time
the necessary corrections be embodied in an
amendment to be added to said schedule and
likewise approved by the Department."
October 6 the Department advised the
Commission that the law hereinbefore
mentioned imposed upon it the duty of
investigating and determining what lands are
subject to segregation and said:
"Your Commission can not substitute the
judgment of the Delaware Indians or any of
them, or anyone acting for them or any of
them, for your own judgment in this matter."
The Commission was advised that the
segregation to become effective must meet
with the approval of the Department; that
the list or schedule referred to did not
meet the requirements stated, and it was
instructed to at once make such examination
and investigation as would enable the
Commission to determine what tracts should
be added to the list and what tracts then
embraced therein should be excluded. October
29 the Department directed the Commission to
make a list of the tracts embraced in the
schedule mentioned, showing lands claimed
and occupied by Delaware to which there were
no adverse claims, a list embracing all
tracts claimed by Delaware Indians but not
included in the list previously presented to
the Commission, and a list embracing the
tracts included in the list previously
presented to the Commission to which some
Cherokee citizen other than a Delaware made
claim, and forward these lists to the
Department with recommendation as to what
action should be taken by the Department
upon each list. The Commission makes no
mention of either of these letters, and it
does not appear that the Department's
instructions have been complied with.
Therefore the Commission's report and papers
accompanying the same, including a map of
the Cherokee Nation, are enclosed herewith
for such action as you may be pleased to
take thereon.
Very respectfully,
W. A. JONES, Commissioner
Allotment of Lands to
Delaware Indians
Allotment of Lands to Delaware Indians, 58th Congress, 2nd Session,
Senate, No.104, 1904
Free
Genealogy |
Indian
Genealogy |
Allotment of Lands to
Delaware Indians
|
|