Genealogy | Native American | Shop | DNA | About Us
Tell A Friend! Order Family Tree Maker 2012

Genealogy Records

Genealogy
Biographies
Cemetery Records
Census Records
DNA
Family Tree Search
History Books Online
Military Records
Native American Records
Surnames
Vital Records
World Genealogy

Indian Genealogy

Proving Your Indian Heritage
Native American Rolls
Indian Tribal Histories
Indian Tribes by Location
Indian Books and Articles
Indian Census Records
Indian Cemetery Records

Indian Tribes

Abenaki Indians
Algonquian Indians
Apache Indians
Arapaho Indians
Blackfeet Indians
Caddo Indians
Cherokee Indians
Cheyenne Indians
Chickasaw Indians
Chinook Indians
Chippewa Indians
Choctaw Indians
Comanche Indians
Cree Indians
Creek Indians
Crow Indians
Dakota Indians
Delaware Indians
Fox Indians
Hopi Indians
Huron Indians
Illinois Indians
Iowa Indians
Iroquois Indians
Kansa Indians
Kickapoo Indians
Kiowa Indians
Menominee Indians
Miami Indians
Missouri Indians
Modoc Indians
Mohawk Indians
Mohegan Indians
Munsee Indians
Natchez Indians
Navajo Indians
Nex Percé Indians
Omaha Indians
Onondaga Indians
Osage Indians
Oto Indians
Ottawa Indians
Paiute Indians
Pawnee Indians
Pottawatomie Indians
Sauk Indians
Seminole Indians
Seneca Indians
Shawnee Indians
Siouan Indians
Sioux Indians
Stockbridge Indians
Tuscarora Indians
Winnebago Indians
Zuni Indians



 

The Kealedji Tribe

Search Fold3 For Your
Native American Ancestors:
Given:
Surname:

According to native tradition this was a branch of Tukabahchee, but, if so, it must have separated at a very early date. Gatschet says that the name appears to refer to a warrior's headdress, containing the words ika, his head, and a verb meaning to kill (iłäidshäs, I kill) .1 This seems probable. At any rate the name evidently is not old enough to be worn down much by age and suggests a comparatively recent origin for the group. This is also confirmed to a considerable extent by the absence of its name from the earliest documents. Probably it is the "Gowalege" placed on a southern affluent of the Ocmulgee on the Moll map of 1720,2 and perhaps the "Calalek" of the De Crenay map,3 since in the French census of 1760 we find a town "Kalalekis"6 which looks like a misprinted form of the name of this town. In the Spanish list of Creek towns made up in 1738 the name is spelled "Caialeche" and in that of 1750 "Kalechy."7 It is certainly the "Coillegees near Oakchoy'' of the census of 1761, the traders of which were Crook & Co.8 In. 1797 the traders were John O' Riley, an Irishman, and Townlay Bruce, of Maryland, formerly a clerk in the Indian Department, "removed for improper conduct."9 It is in the list of Bartram10 and in that of Swan,11 and is thus described by Hawkins:

Ki-a-li-jee; on the right side of Kialijee Creek, two and a hall miles below the junction with Hook-choie. This creek joins the right side of Tallapoosa, above the falls; all the rich flats of the creek are settled; the land about the town is poor and broken; the fields are on the narrow flats and in the bends of the creek; the broken land is gravelly or stony; the range for cattle, hogs, and horses is the poorest in the nation; the neighborhood of the town and the town itself has nothing to recommend it. The timber is pine, oak, and small hickory; the creek is fifteen12 feet wide, and joins Tallapoosa fifteen12 miles above Took-au-bat-che. They have two villages belonging to this town.

1st. Au-che-nau-hat-che; from au-che-nau cedar; and hat-che, a creek. They have a few settlements on this creek, and some fine, thriving peach trees; the land on the creek is broken, but good.13

2d. Hat-che-chub-bau; from hat-che, a creek; and chub-bau, the middle, or halfway. This is in the pine forest, a poor, ill-chosen site, and there are but a few people.14

The last-mentioned settlement and the main town were burned by hostile Creeks in 1813. The name Kealedji occurs in the list of 1832.15 After their removal west these people settled m the south-eastern part of the Creek Nation, where they still (1912) have a dance ground but no regular square.

Hatcheetcaba (Håtci tcåbå), the second village of Hawkins, appears as far back as the census of 1760.16 It is also in those of 1761,17 and 183218 but not in the lists of Bartram and Swan. It preserved its identity after removal to Oklahoma, where it maintained a dance ground, but it is not certain that it ever had a regular square.

Back to: The Muskogee Tribe

Footnotes:

  1. The Lib. Cong. MS. has "17."
  2. Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., III, pp. 40-41. 1720 A new map of the north parts of America claimed by France, Hargrett Rare Book and Manuscript Library.
  3. Also on plate 3.
  4. Gatschet, Creek Mig. Leg., I, p. 133.
  5. Plate 5; also Hamilton, Col. Mobile, p. 190.
  6. Miss. Prov. Arch., I, p. 95.
  7. MSS., Ayer Lib.
  8. Ga. Col. Docs., VIII, p. 523.
  9. Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., IX, p. 169.
  10. Bartram, Travels, p. 462.
  11. Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, v, p. 262.
  12. The Lib. Cong. MS. has " 20 " in each of these places.
  13. In his " Letters'' he says this village consisted of "6 habitations and a small town house.'' - Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., IX, p. 34.
  14. Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., III, pp. 48-49.
  15. Senate Doc. 512, 23d Cong., 1st sess., IV, pp. 327-330.
  16. Miss. Prov. Arch., I, p. 95.
  17. Ga. Col. Docs., VIII, p. 523.
  18. Senate Doc. 512, 23d Cong., 1st sess., IV, pp. 278-280

Back to: The Muskogee Tribe

Notes About Book:

Source: Swanton, John R., Early History of the Creek Indians and Their Neighbors. Pub. Smithsonian Institution, Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 73. Washington, 1922.

Notes about Online Publication: This manuscript has been ocr'd and heavily edited. Many of the Native American words have been reproduced as clearly as online publication will allow us, but not all are exactly the way they were in the original work. The structure of this manuscript has been changed to allow better online presentation.

 

 

Genealogy Websites

Other Websites

Disclaimer:

This site includes some historical materials that may imply negative stereotypes reflecting the culture or language of a particular period or place. These items are presented as part of the historical record and should not be interpreted to mean that the WebMasters in any way endorse the stereotypes implied.


Access Genealogy is the largest free genealogy website not owned by Ancestry. As such, it relies on the revenue from commercial genealogy companies such as Ancestry to pay for the server and other expenses related to producing and warehousing such a large collection of data. If you're considering joining either of these programs, why not join using the links above, and help support free genealogy online!

Copyright 1999-2013, by Access Genealogy.com
A project by Webified Development