|
The Creek, Uchean and Seminole in Indian Territory
The Creeks were originally a fierce and warlike tribe with great organizing
and controlling capacity. The original Creek confederacy was a confederacy of
towns. Each town was a complete government in itself: There was a town chief for
each town and a body of men in the nature of an advisory council, and in this
great council of the confederacy these several towns were represented by the
town chiefs.
These Creek towns are still preserved in the Creek Nation in Indian Territory,
and are in fact representative districts. In 1832 they made a treaty with the
United States ceding the lands of their old homes, and removed to Indian
Territory, which, in fact, they settled at the "Old Agency".
Twenty-four thousand five' hundred and ninety-four Creeks were removed west of
the Mississippi in 1832 and after, only 744 remaining on their old limiting
grounds. At the breaking out of the civil war the western Creeks were estimated
to number less than 15,000. The Creeks divided on the war of 1861, and engaged
in pitched battles against each other, the Unionists suffering badly, many
fleeing to Kansas. They were brought together again after the war, and in 1872
numbered, as estimated, 13,000, and in 1890, by their census, 14,800.
Creeks In South Carolina
Harry Hammond, in the work on South Carolina already cited, speaks of the Creeks
as follows (page 366):
Nation: Creeks or Muscogee. Tribes: Savannah, Serena, Cusoboe, Yamassee, Huspa,
and Cosida Fragmentary tribes on the Savannah River, south of the Uchees, in
Barnwell County.
The Yamassees numbered about 100 men, women, and children, near Pocotaligo, in
1715, and were driven across the Savannah by Governor Craven. Twenty men of the
tribe were left at St: Augustine, Florida, in 1743, and they were absorbed by
the Seminoles. The Yamassee, or Jamassi, were one of a small number of isolated
tribes, of clerk complexion, found widely scattered among the inhabitants of
North and South America. Supposed to have been immigrants from Africa prior to
the European discovery of America (See Human Species, by A. De Quatrefages). If
this be so, it explains why D'Alyon persisted in slave hunting about Beaufort
(1520), these Negroes being valuable as laborers, while the Indians were
worthless. It were strange, too, if Negroes first occupied this section where
they now predominate.
Salutah: Located near Saluda, old town, Newberry County, removed to Conestoga;
in Pennsylvania.
Congaree: On the river of that name. John Lawson visited them in 1700 and found
a town of 12 huts, one man at home and the women gambling.
Santee: Near Nelsons Ferry in Clarendon. John Lawson found a few of their huts
in 1700.
Westoes and Stonoes: Between Edisto and Ashley Rivers in Colleton and Charleston
counties; amalgamated with the Catawbas. Wateree and Chikasee: On Pine Tree
creek, Kershaw County. Lawson says they were more populous than the Congarees.
Waxsaws: Lawson makes a day's march from the last.
Wenee: Indian. Old township, Williamsburg County.
Winyaw On the inlet of that name.
Sewee: On Sewee bay. Lawson says the larger part, of them were lost at sea, or
rescued and sold as slaves by the English in an attempt they made to open direct
communication with England by a fleet of canoes, in which they put to sea in the
direction whence they had observed the English vessels arrive.
Saraw, or Cheraw: Chesterfield and Marlboro Counties, absorbed by the Catawbas.
Kadapaw: Lynchs creek. Joined the Catawbas.
The Pee Dees are not mentioned, as it is thought the name is of European origin,
probably from P. D., the initials of Patrick Daly, a white man, carved upon a
tree by an early settler.
The 19 tribes claimed under the Creek Nation, occupying at least one-half of the
state, appear to have been very insignificant in numbers, according to the
earliest authentic accounts of them. Governor Glenn sums them up in one
sentence: "There are among our settlements several small tribes of Indians,
consisting only of some few families each ". Lawson says of them: "Although
their tribes or nations border upon one another, yet you may often discern as
great an alteration in their features and disposition (he was ranch impressed by
the comeliness of the Congaree women) as you can in their speech, which
generally proves quite different from each other, ' though their nations be not
above 10 or 20 miles in distance.
The Creeks in South Carolina at their discovery by the whites are estimated by
Hammond at about 400.
Uchees, Muskhogean Stock, With The Creeks , With the Creeks are the Uchees or
Euchees of Uchean stock. The Uchees are part of the Uchees who once occupied the
southern part of Georgia and peninsula of Florida. They consolidated with the
Creeks in or about 1729, being of the same stock. They became for all purposes
Creeks, and removed with them to Indian Territory in 1832. They now live in a
district by themselves in the northwest corner of the Creek Nation and number
from 400 to 700. They speak their own language, a peculiar guttural one, and
intermarry among themselves. In taking the census of 1890, great difficulty was
found in obtaining an enumerator competent to enroll them.
Harry Hammond (op. cit., page. 366) says of them:
About one-eighth of the territory of the Uchees extended across the Savannah
River into Aiken, Edgefield, and Barnwell Counties. There is no estimate of
their numbers. Their Princess of Cutifachiqui (Silver Blum) entertained De Soto
with great splendor, according to the narrative of the Gentleman of Elves
(1540). They were absorbed by the Creeks, and have left no trace except in the
name of a small stream in Silverton township, Aiken County, and of a neighboring
steamboat landing on the Savannah, Talemeco, after their great temple, which it
is said stood there in De Soto's time.
Uchean Family
As to the name, original location, and
geographic distribution of the Uchees, the
Seventh Annual Report of the Bureau of
Ethnology, 1885-1886 states, (pages 126,
127):
Uchees, Gallatin in Trans. and Coll. Am.
Antiq. Soc. II., 95, 1836 (based upon the
Uchees alone). Bancroft, Hist. U.S. III,
247, 1840. Gallatin in Trans. Am. Eth. Soc.,
II., pt. 1, xcix, 77, 1848. Keane, App.
Stanford's Comp. (Cent. and So. Am. that the
language may have been akin to Natchez.
Uchees, Gallatin in Trans. and Coll. Am.
Antiq. Soc., II, 306, 1836. Gallatin in
Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, III, 401,
Stanford's Comp. (Cent. and So. Ann) 472,
1878.
Utschies, Berghaus (1845), Physik. Atlas,
map 17, 1848. Ibid., 1852.
Uche Latham, Nat. Hist. Man, 338, 1850
(Coosa River). Latham in Trans. Philolog.
Soc. Lond., II., 31-50, 1846. Latham,
Opuscula, 293, 1860.
Yuchi, Gatschet, Creek Mig. Legend, I, 17,
1884. Gatschet in Science, 413, April 29,
1887.
The following is the account of this tribe
given by Gallatin (probably derived from
Hawkins) in Archaeologia Americana, page 95:
The original seats of the Uchees Were east
of Coosa and probably of the Chatahoochee;
and they consider themselves as the most
ancient inhabitants of the country. They may
have been the same nation which is called
Apalaches in the accounts of De Soto's
expedition, and their towns were till lately
principally on Flint River.
Geographic Description.-The pristine
homes of the Yuchi are not now traceable
with any degree of certainty. The Yuchi are
supposed to have been visited by De Soto
during his memorable march, and the town of
Cofitachiqui chronicled by him is believed
by many investigators to have stood at
Silver Bluff, on the left bank of the
Savannah, about 25 miles below Augusta. If,
as is supposed by some authorities,
Cofitachiqui was a Yuchi town, this would
locate the Yuchi in a section which, when
first known to the whites, was occupied by
the Shawnee. Later the Yuchi appear to have
lived somewhat farther clown the Savannah on
the eastern and also the western side, as
far as the Ogeechee River, and also upon
tracts above and below Augusta, Georgia.
These tracts were claimed by them as late as
1736.
In 1729 a portion of the Yuchi left their
old seats and settled among the Lower Creek
on the Chatahoochee River; there they
established 3 colony villages in the
neighborhood, and later on a Yuchi
settlement is mentioned on Lower Tallapoosa
River among the Upper Creek. Filson gives a
list of 30 Indian tribes and a statement
concerning Yuchi towns which he must have
obtained from a much earlier source: "Uchees
occupy 4 different places of residence, at
the head of St. Johns, the fork of St.
Marys, the head of Cannouchee, and the head
of St. Tillie" (Satilla), etc.
Population, More than 600 Yuchi
reside in northeastern Indian Territory,
upon the Arkansas River, where they are
usually classed as Creek. Doubtless the
latter are to some extent intermarried with
them but the Yuchi are jealous of their name
and tenacious of their position as a tribe.
The Seminoles
When the Creeks resided in Alabama it was
customary for the members of the confederacy
to go on bunting excursions, and sometimes
these hunting parties would be gone for
months. They would go a distance of from 100
to 200 miles. In one of these hunting
excursions the Seminoles, the word "
Seminole" meaning strayed people, failed to
return to the tribe and remained permanently
away, and on this account it is said that
they were called Seminoles; in the language
of the Creeks, Isti-Semole, wild or strayed
men. They are Creeks, and they were
considered as such and treated with the
Creeks as one people until the treaty of
1866. In treaties prior to that time the
Seminoles and Creeks are all spoken of as
one people.
In 1856 the Creeks by treaty sold the
Seminoles a tract of country, which they
occupied for a time, and in 1866 they sold
it to the United States for 15 cents an
acre. - In. 1866 the Seminoles bought of the
United States, at 50 cents an acre, 200,000
acres of Creek land which they now occupy,
being part of their lands. Under the treaty
of 1856 they could bring, as they did, a
portion of their brethren from Florida. The
Seminoles in Florida in 1890 numbered 171,
all self-sustaining. They are in two
distinct bands, the Okechobee and Tiger
Tails band near the Everglades and Key
Biscayne. They are famous hunters and
fishermen.
The Creeks in 1881-4882 sold the Seminoles
another tract of 175,000 acres, which they
now occupy, making their entire laud
holdings in Indian Territory 375,000 acres,
or 586 square miles. By the treaty of 1866
the United States recognizes the Seminoles
as a separate and distinct nation. They are
the least known of any of The Five Civilized
Tribes. They are exclusive and keep to
themselves, with not much desire for
advanced education.
Condition of the Indian by State, 1890
Notes About the Book:
Source: Report on Indians Taxed and Indians not Taxed in the United States, Except
Alaska at the Eleventh Census: 1890, Department of the Interior, Government
Printing Office, Washington DC., 1894
A
Report to the Secretary of War of the United
States on Indian Affairs, by Rev. Jedidiah
Morse, 1822, Printed by S. Converse
Online Publication: The manuscript was scanned and
then ocr'd. Minimal editing has been done, and readers can and should expect
some errors in the textual output. Several spellings have been used for the same
tribe of Indians.
This site includes some historical materials that may imply negative
stereotypes reflecting the culture or language of a particular period or place.
These items are presented as part of the historical record and should not be
interpreted to mean that the WebMasters in any way endorse the stereotypes
implied.
Free
Genealogy |
Indian
Genealogy |
Condition of the Indian by State, 1890
|
|