|
Handbook of American Indians North of Mexico
During the early exploration and
settlement of North America a multitude of
Indian tribes were encountered, having
diverse customs and languages. Lack of
knowledge of the aborigines and of their
languages led to many curious errors on the
part of the early explorers and settlers:
names were applied to the Indians that had
no relation what-ever to their aboriginal
names; sometimes nicknames were bestowed,
owing perhaps to personal characteristics,
fancied or real; sometimes tribes came to be
known by names given by other tribes, which
were often opprobrious; frequently the
designation by which a tribal group was
known to itself was employed, and as such
names are oftentimes unpronounceable by
alien tongues and unrepresentable
by civilized alphabets, the result was a sorry corruption,
varying according as the sounds were impressed on Spanish,
English, French, Dutch, German, Russian, or Swedish ears.
Sometimes, again, bands of a single tribe were given distinctive
tribal names, while clans and gentes were often regarded as
independent autonomous groups to which separate tribal
designations likewise were applied. Consequently, in the
literature relating to the American Indians, which is
practically coextensive with the literature of the first three
centuries of the New World, thousands of such names are
recorded, the significance and application of which are to be
understood only after much study.
The need of a comprehensive work on the subject has
been felt ever since scientific interest in the Indians was
first aroused. Many lists of tribes have been published, but the
scientific student, as well as the general reader, until the
present time has been practically without the means of knowing
any more about a given confederacy, tribe, clan, or settlement
of Indians than was to be gleaned from casual references to it.
The work of which this Handbook is an outgrowth had its
inception as early as 1873, when Prof. Otis T. Mason, now of the
United States National Museum, began the preparation of a list
of the tribal names mentioned in the vast literature pertaining
to the Indians, and in due time several thousand names were
recorded, with references to the works in which they appear. The
work was continued by him until after the establishment of the
Bureau, when other duties compelled its suspension. Later the
task was assigned to Col. Garrick Mallery, who, however, soon
abandoned it for investigations in a field which proved to be
his life work, namely, the pictography and sign language of the
American Indians. Meanwhile Mr. James Mooney was engaged in
compiling a similar list of tribes, with their synonymy,
classified chiefly on a geographic basis and covering the entire
Western Hemisphere—a work begun in 1873 and continued for twelve
years before either he or the members of the Bureau of American
Ethnology knew of the labors of each other in this field.
Soon after the organization of the Bureau in 1879, the
work of recording a tribal synonymy was formally assigned to Mr.
Henry W. Henshaw. Up to this time a complete linguistic
classification of the tribes north of Mexico, particularly in
the West and Northwest, was not possible, since sufficient data
had not been gathered for determining their linguistic
affinities. Mr. Henshaw soon perceived that a linguistic
classification of the Indian tribes, a work long contemplated by
Major Powell, must precede and form the basis for a tribal
synonymy, and to him, therefore, as a necessary preliminary, was
entrusted the supervision of such a linguistic classification.
By 1885 the Bureau's researches in this direction had reached a
stage that warranted the grouping of practically all the known
tribes by linguistic stocks. This classification is published in
the Seventh Annual Report of the Bureau, and on it is based,
with few exceptions, the present Handbook.
Immediately on the completion of the linguistic
classification, the entire force of the Bureau, louder Mr.
Henshaw's immediate direction, was assigned to the work that had
now grown into a Dictionary and Synonymy of the Indian Tribes
North of Mexico. As his special field Mr. Henshaw devoted
attention to several of the Californian stocks, and to those of
the North Pacific coast, north of Oregon, including the Eskimo.
To Mr. Mooney were given the great and historically important
Algonquian and Iroquoian families, and through his wide general
knowledge of Indian history and customs he rendered aid in many
other directions. A list of Linguistic Families of the Indian
Tribes North of Mexico, with Provisional List of the Principal
Tribal Names and Synonyms (55 pp., octavo), was at once printed
for use by the collaborators of the Bureau in connection with
the complete compilation, and although the list does not include
the Californian tribes, it proved of great service in the
earlier stages of the work. The 2,500 tribal names and synonyms
appearing in this list were taken chiefly front Mr. Mooney's
manuscript; the linguistic classification was the result of the
work that the Bureau had been conducting under Mr. Henshaw's
supervision.
Rev. J. Owen Dorsey assumed charge of the work on the
Siouan, Caddoan, and Athapascan stocks; Dr W. J. Hoffman, under
the personal direction of Major Powell, devoted his energies to
the Shoshonean family, and Mr. Jeremiah Curtin, by reason of his
familiarity with a number of the Californian tribes, rendered
direct aid to Mr. Henshaw in that field. Dr Albert . Gatschet
employed his time and long experience in the preparation of the
material pertaining to the Muskhogean tribes of southeastern
United States, the Yuman tribes of the lower Colorado drainage
and of Lower California, and various smaller linguistic groups.
To Col. Garrick Mallery were assigned the French authors bearing
on the general subject. With such aid the work:. received a
pronounced impetus, and before the close of 1885 a large body of
additional material had been recorded. Four years later the
elaboration of the material pertaining to the Yuman, Piman,
Keresan, Tanoan, and Zuñian
stocks of the extreme Southwest was placed in charge of Mr. F.
W. Hodge, who brought it to completion.
The work was continued under Mr. Henshaw's supervision
until, in 1893; ill health compelled his abandonment of the
task. This is the more to be regretted as Mr. Henshaw had in
course of preparation a classification and nomenclature of the
minor divisions of the linguistic stocks, which is essential to
a proper presentation and a clear under-standing of the subject.
After Mr. Henshaw's relinquishment of the work, Mr. Hodge was
given entire charge of it. But other official duties of members
of the staff prevented the handbook as a whole. from making
marked progress until 1899, when Dr Cyrus Thomas was intrusted
with the task of revising the recorded material bearing on the
Algonquian, Siouan, and Muskhogean families.
In 1902 the work on the Handbook was again
systematically taken up, at the instance of Secretary Langley,
who detailed Mr. Hodge, at that time connected immediately with
the Smithsonian Institution, to undertake its general editorial
supervision. The scope of the subject-matter was enlarged to
include the relations between the aborigines and the-Government;
their archeology-, manners, customs, arts. and industries; brief
biographies of Indians of note; and words of aboriginal origin
that have found their way into the English language. It was
proposed also to' include. Indian names that are purely
geographic, but by reason of the vast number of these it was
subsequently deemed advisable to embody them eventually in an
independent work. Moreover, it was provided that the work should
be illustrated as adequately as time. and the illustrative
material available would admit, a feature not originally
contemplated. To fully cover this vast field at the present time
is impossible, by reason of the fact that research among the
native tribes, notwithstanding the extensive and important work
that has been accomplished in recent years, has not advanced far
beyond the first stage, even when is taken into account the sum
of knowledge derived from the researches of the Bureau and of
other institutions, as well as of individuals.
The lack of completeness of our present knowledge of
the tribes was, perhaps, never better shown than when an attempt
was made to carry out the enlarged plan of the Handbook. With
its limited force the Bureau could scarcely hope to cover the
entire range of the subject within a reasonable time;
consequently various specialists not directly connected with the
Bureau were invited to assist—an invitation that was accepted in
a manner most gratifying. It is owing to the generous aid of
these students that a work so complete as the Handbook is
intended to be was made possible, and to them the Bureau owes
its deep appreciation. That the handbook has many imperfections
there is no doubt, but it is hoped that in future editions the
weak points may be strengthened and the gaps filled, until, as
researches among the tribes are continued, the compilation will
eventually represent a complete summary of existing knowledge
respecting the aborigines of northern America.
The scope of the Handbook is as comprehensive as its
function necessitates. It treats of all the tribes north of
Mexico, including the Eskimo, and those tribes south of the
boundary more or less affiliated with those in the United
States. It has been the aim to give a brief description of every
linguistic stock, confederacy, tribe, subtrihe or tribal
division, and settlement known to history or even to tradition,
as well as the origin and derivation of every name treated,
whenever such is known, and to record under each every form of
the name and every other appellation that could be learned.
These synonyms, in alphabetic order, are assembled as cross
references in Part 2.
Under the tribal descriptions a brief account of the
ethnic relations of the tribe, its history, its location at
various periods, statistics of population, etc., are included.
Accompanying each synonym (the earliest known date always being
given) a reference to the authority is noted, and these
references form practically a bibliography of the tribe for
those who desire to pursue the subject further. It is not
claimed that every spelling of every tribal name that occurs in
print is given, but it is believed that a sufficient number of
forms is recorded to enable the student to identify practically
every name by which any group of Indians has been known, as well
as to trace the origin of many of the terms that have been
incorporated into our geographic nomenclature.
In many instances the treatises are satisfactorily
illustrated; in others, Hitch necessarily has been left to a
future edition in order that the present publication may not be
further delayed. The work of illustration was entrusted largely
to Mr. De Lancey Gill.
The contributors to Part 1, in addition to those who
have rendered valued assistance by affording information,
correcting proofs, and in other ways, are as follows, the names
being arranged in the alphabetical order of the initials
attached to the signed articles:
A. C. F.
A. F. C.
A. H.
A. L. D.
A. L. K.
A. S. G.
C. M. F.
C. T.
E. G. E.
E. L. H.
F. B.
F. H.
F. H. C.
F. C. C.
F. W. H.
G. A. D.
G. B. G.
G. F.
G. P. M.
H. E. B.
H. W. H.
J. C.
J. D. M.
J. H. D.
J. M.
J. McL.
J. N. B. H.
J. O. D.
J. R. S.
J. W. F.
L. F.
M. E. G.
M. K. S.
O. T. M.
P. E. B.
P. E. G.
R. B. D.
R. H. L.
S. A. B.
S. C.
S. M. B.
W. E.
W. H.
W. H. H.
W. J.
W. M. |
Alice
C. Fletcher of Washington.
Alexander F. Chamberlain of Clark University.
A. Hrdlicka of the -United States National Museum.
Anna L. Dawes of Pittsfield, Mass.
A. L. Kroeber of the University of California.
Albert S. Gatschet, formerly of the Bureau of American
Ethnology.
Cora M. Folsom of the Hampton Normal and Agricultural
Institute, Hampton, Va.
Cyrus Thomas of the Bureau of American Ethnology.
Elaine Goodale Eastman of Amherst, Mass.
Edgar L. Hewett of Washington.
Franz Boas of Columbia University.
Frank Huntington, formerly of the Bureau of American
Ethnology.
The late Frank Hamilton Cushing of the Bureau of American
Ethnology
F. C. Colville of the United States Department of
Agriculture.
F. W. Hodge of the Bureau of American Ethnology.
George A. Dorsey of the Field Museum of Natural History.
George Bird Grinnell of New York.
Gerard Fowke of Saint Louis.
George P. Merrill of the United Stales National Museum.
Herbert. E. Bolton of the University of Texas.
Henry W. Henshaw, formerly of the Bureau of :American
Ethnology.
The late Jeremiah Curtin of the Bureau of American
Ethnology.
Joseph D. McGuire of Washington.
Josiah H. Dortch of the Office of Indian Affairs.
James Mooney of the Bureau of American Ethnology.
James McLaughlin of the Office of Indian Affairs.
J. N. B. Hewitt of the Bureau of American Ethnology.
The late J. Owen Dorsey of the Bureau of American
Ethnology.
John R. Swanton of the Bureau of American Ethnology.
J. Walter Fewkes of the Bureau of American Ethnology.
Livingston Farrand of Columbia University.
Merrill E. Gates of the Board of Indian Commissioners.
M. K. Sniffen of the Indian Rights Association.
Otis T. Mason of the United States National Museum.
Paul Edmond Beckwith of the United States National Museum.
P. E. Goddard of the University of California.
Roland R. Dixon of Harvard University
Robert H. Lowie of New York.
S. A. Barrett of the University of California.
Stewart Culin of the Brooklyn Institute Museum.
S. M. Brosius of the Indian Rights Association.
Wilberforce Eames of the New York Public library.
Walter Hough of the United States National Museum.
H. William H. Holmes of the Bureau of American Ethnology.
William Jones of the Field Museum of Natural History.
The late Washington Matthews, United States Army. |
F. W. HODGE.
Bureau of American Ethnology, December 1906
Return to
Native American by Location
|
|