Genealogy | Native American | DNA | About Us
Tell A Friend! Pre-Order Family Tree Maker 2012!!!

Genealogy Records

Genealogy
Biographies
Cemetery Records
Census Records
DNA
Family Tree Search
History Books Online
Military Records
Native American Records
Surnames
Vital Records
World Genealogy

Indian Genealogy

Proving Your Indian Heritage
Native American Rolls
Indian Tribal Histories
Indian Tribes by Location
Indian Books and Articles
Indian Genealogy Queries
Indian Census Records
Indian Cemetery Records

Indian Tribes

Abenaki Indians
Algonquian Indians
Apache Indians
Arapaho Indians
Blackfeet Indians
Caddo Indians
Cherokee Indians
Cheyenne Indians
Chickasaw Indians
Chinook Indians
Chippewa Indians
Choctaw Indians
Comanche Indians
Cree Indians
Creek Indians
Crow Indians
Dakota Indians
Delaware Indians
Fox Indians
Hopi Indians
Huron Indians
Illinois Indians
Iowa Indians
Iroquois Indians
Kansa Indians
Kickapoo Indians
Kiowa Indians
Menominee Indians
Miami Indians
Missouri Indians
Modoc Indians
Mohawk Indians
Mohegan Indians
Munsee Indians
Natchez Indians
Navajo Indians
Nex Percé Indians
Omaha Indians
Onondaga Indians
Osage Indians
Oto Indians
Ottawa Indians
Paiute Indians
Pawnee Indians
Pottawatomie Indians
Sauk Indians
Seminole Indians
Seneca Indians
Shawnee Indians
Siouan Indians
Sioux Indians
Stockbridge Indians
Tuscarora Indians
Winnebago Indians
Zuni Indians


 

Surname Gamblin to Greenleaf

Gamblin, John H.. et al.
Choctaws by blood. Indian Office files: Land 24250-1909. These applicants wore adjudged to be entitled to enrollment by the Commissioner to Five Civilized Tribes February 14, 1907. This action was taken under certain rulings of the department relating to the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Interior, pursuant to which It was the practice to hear and adjudicate such cases upon their merits notwithstanding prior adverse action. This construction was not concurred in by the Attorney General, who, in an opinion rendered February 19, 1907, he'd, or at least seemed to hold, that the Secretary of the Interior had been exercising jurisdiction in cases wherein he had no authority to act. As a result of said opinion of the Attorney General, the Secretary of the Interior, on March 1, 1907. solely on jurisdictional grounds rescinded the favorable decision theretofore rendered by the Commissioner to Five Civilized Tribes, the result being that the applicants failed to secure enrollment. Assuming the correctness of the commissioner's decision, they were entitled, upon the merits of their cases, to be enrolled.
Number of claimants In this memorandum, approximately, 5.

Garland (Christian name not known). (Minor.)
Choctaw by blood. Files: See memorandum of information obtained tit Hugo. Okla., November 12, 1912. with Part I, Exhibit F. report of March 3, 1909. This child is entitled to enrollment and is now living with a family near Nesholi, Okla. Mr. Hudson has been informed that the child is the offspring of Simon Garland but that the facts concerning its birth were of such a nature that they were suppressed and no application made In order to save the family pride.
Number of claimants In this memorandum, 1.

Gatewood, Alice, et al.
Chickasaw. She seeks transfer from Chickasaw freedman roll to Chickasaw blood roll, claiming that her mother was a full-blood Indian and a blood relation of Sarah Jane Sanders, on approved Chickasaw rolls opposite No. 2093. This claim includes the children of Alice Gatewood and her grandson, Theodore D. Roosevelt Logan. No. 6.

Geggs,  (Son of Gilbert or Joseph Geggs.)
Choctaw by blood. Files: Statement of Edward Dukes, ex-governor of the Choctaw Nation, made November 13, 1908, at office of district Indian agent, Antlers, Okla. Mr. Dukes states that this claimant. Mr. Geggs, is his nephew and he believes him to be a one-fourth blood Choctaw. Geggs married a Choctaw woman and therefore claims both by blood and intermarriage.
Number of claimants in this memorandum, 1.

Givens, Luther.
Givens
. (Christian name unknown). (Deceased.)
Creeks by blood. Files: Part III, reported March 3. 1909. It is claimed that Luther Givens was born in February 1906: that his father is enrolled as a Creek citizen: that his mother is a full-blood Creek, and also enrolled. It. is also claimed that no application was made for the enrollment of the child, because the parents were prevented by high water from meeting the field party which was in charge of enrollment in the Creek Nation.
Number of claimants In this memorandum, 2.

Goins, Ransom, et al
Goins, Reuben, et al
Goins, Ransom, Jr.
Southern, Mrs. William
Choctaws by blood. Files: Part II. Exhibit F. report March 3, 1909. Ransom and Reuben Goins are brothers. Mrs. Southern is their sister. All claim to be half-blood Choctaws. The two men appeared at the office of the district Indian Agent, at Pauls Valley, Okla., November 20, 1908, and made statements as to their claims. Both me obviously some kind of Indian blood, and Ransom speaks the Choctaw language. Residence, Indian Territory since 1875. Reuben also claims that he has a right as an intermarried Chickasaw, by reason of marriage to his present wife. Ransom Coins, jr., Is a son of Ransom Coins, sr.
Number of claimants in this memorandum, 4.

Grass, Josie.
Cherokee by blood. Files: Report Acting Commissioner to the Five Civilized Tribes. January 15. 1!)10, addressed to Hon. J. George Wright. Josie Grass, age 5 years, child of Tom and Betsy Crass, Cherokees. Number of claimants in this memorandum, 1.

Grazier, Viola. Afton, Okla.
Cherokee by blood. Files: Report of November 15 1907, from Commissioner to the Five Civilized Tribes. Case No. 4079. Viola Grazier was born August 20, 1902. and is a child of Homer H. Grazier, whose name appears upon the approved roll of citizens by blood of the Cherokee Nation, opposite No. 0841, being enrolled as three-eighths Indian, and one Dora Grazier, a noncitizen: of the Cherokee Nation. The application for her enrollment was made October 3, 1902, and on February 20. 1907, the former commissioner rendered his decision ordering her enrolled as a citizen by blood of the Cherokee Nation. No protest against her enrollment was filed by the attorney for the Cherokee Nation, but through oversight she was not placed upon a schedule of Cherokee citizens and forwarded for departmental approval. Number of claimants in this memorandum, 1.

Greenleaf, Mary W.
Greenleaf. Robert W. (Minor.)
Greenleaf, Margaret M. (Minor.)
Cherokees by blood. Files: Record on file in Indian Office. (Sce also opinion of A. A. G. for Interior Department. December 14, 1904.) These claimants are undoubtedly Cherokees by blood. Mary W. Greenleaf Is the mother of the other applicants and is the daughter of Amos Williamson, a white man. and a Cherokee woman named Margaret Williamson, now Brackett. whose name appears upon the confirmed Cherokee roll of 1880. The parents separated in 1855, and Mary W. Greenleaf was taken from the Cherokee Nation, of which she was a citizen by birth, by her father to one of the States. Her Cherokee nativity and blood were concealed from her until September. 1900, when they were disclosed to her by her stepmother. As appears from the opinion of the A. A. G.. referred to above, the applicants were entitled to enrollment as a matter of right, but that for jurisdictional reasons the commission to the Five Civilized Tribes had no authority to enroll them.
Number of claimants in this memorandum. 4.

 


Notes About the Book:

Source: Five Civilized Tribes In Oklahoma, Reports of the Department of the Interior and Evidentiary Papers in support of S. 7625, a Bill for the Relief of Certain Members of the Five Civilized Tribes in Oklahoma, Sixty-second Congress, Third Session, Published 1913, by the Department of the Interior, United States.

Online Publication: The manuscript was scanned and then ocr'd. Minimal editing has been done, and readers can and should expect some errors in the textual output.

 

Genealogy Websites

Other Websites

Disclaimer:

This site includes some historical materials that may imply negative stereotypes reflecting the culture or language of a particular period or place. These items are presented as part of the historical record and should not be interpreted to mean that the WebMasters in any way endorse the stereotypes implied.


Access Genealogy is the largest free genealogy website not owned by Ancestry. As such, it relies on the revenue from commercial genealogy companies such as Ancestry to pay for the server and other expenses related to producing and warehousing such a large collection of data. If you're considering joining either of these programs, why not join using the links above, and help support free genealogy online!

Copyright 1999-2011, by Access Genealogy.com
A project by Webified Development